Entendendo o impacto dos principais impulsionadores nas apostas contra o beta
um estudo empírico da economia dos EUA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2024v15i3p132-151Palavras-chave:
Apostas contra beta, Anomalia, Economia dos EUA, Volume de negócios, Séries temporais, HML, Sentimentos dos investidoresResumo
Este artigo de pesquisa investiga os fatores que influenciam as apostas contra anomalias beta, incluindo taxa de juros (IR), sentimentos dos investidores (IS), volume de negociação de ações dos EUA (USV), momentum (MOM), alto menos baixo (HML), pequeno menos grande ( SMB) e retorno de mercado superior às letras do Tesouro (MKT). Os dados mensais são utilizados no presente estudo para o período de 1987 a 2014 para empresas dos EUA e os dados são analisados com a ajuda da regressão OLS. Descobrimos que HML, IS e MOM têm um impacto positivo significativo na anomalia BAB, enquanto IR, MKT e USV têm um impacto significativo, mas negativo. Pesquisas anteriores não exploraram simultaneamente esses fatores, tornando nosso estudo distinto em sua análise abrangente. Os resultados deste estudo podem ser utilizados por diversas pessoas para tomar decisões de investimento mais informadas e para melhorar a eficiência dos mercados financeiros.
Referências
Abdollahi, H., Ebrahimi, S. B., & Tayebi, H. (2017). The Effect of Investor Sentiment on Betting Against Beta: A SEM Approach Towards Beta Anomaly. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 201-206.
Baker, M., Bradley, B., & Wurgler, J. (2011). Benchmarks as limits to arbitrage: Understanding the low-volatility anomaly. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(1), 40-54.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. The journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645-1680.
Bali, T. G., Brown, S. J., Murray, S., & Tang, Y. (2014). Betting against beta or demand for lottery. Available at SSRN 2481344.
Barroso, P., & Maio, P. (2016). Managing the risk of the “betting-against-beta” anomaly: does it pay to bet against beta? SSRN Electronic Journal, November.
Bathia, D., Bathia, D. B. D., & Bredin, D. (2016). An examination of investor sentiment effect on G7 stock market returns. Contemporary Issues in Financial Institutions and Markets, vol. II, 2, 99.
Blume, M. E., & Friend, I. (1973). A new look at the capital asset pricing model. The journal of finance, 28(1), 19-33.
Campbell, T. C., & Kassa, H. (2022). Betting against beta under incomplete information. Available at SSRN 3099547.
Canbaş, S., & Kandır, S. Y. (2009). Investor sentiment and stock returns: Evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 45(4), 36-52.
Durham, J. B. (2016). Betting against beta (and gamma) using government bonds. Financial Analysts Journal, November/December.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.
Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of political economy, 81(3), 607-636.
Frazzini, A., & Pedersen, L. H. (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of financial economics, 111(1), 1-25.
Gaies, B., Nakhli, M. S., Ayadi, R., & Sahut, J.-M. (2022). Causal Links Between Investor Sentiment and Financial Instability: New Evidence from a Bootstrap Rolling Window Approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 290-303.
Hakala, M. (2015). Betting against beta and investor sentiment.
Han, X. (2019). Understanding the performance of components in betting against beta. Forthcoming, Critical Finance Review.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of finance, 48(1), 65-91.
Jensen, M. C., Black, F., & Scholes, M. S. (1972). The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests.
Kim, M., & Park, J. (2015). Individual investor sentiment and stock returns: Evidence from the Korean stock market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(sup5), S1-S20.
Kolokolova, O., & Xu, X. (2022). Enhancing Betting Against Beta with Stochastic Dominance. Available at SSRN 4260904.
Lehnert, T. (2022). Betting against noisy beta. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 8, 55-68.
Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information.
Muijsson, C., Fishwick, E., & Satchell, S. (2015). The Low Beta Anomaly and Interest Rates. In Risk-Based and Factor Investing (305-328): Elsevier.
Pasetti, T., & Montagna, D. M. (2021). The Low-Risk Effect, from Betting Against Beta to Betting Against Correlation. Available at SSRN 3995496.
Rana, R., Nagar, R., Bangur, H., & Shelke, A. (2021). Testing the Betting against Beta proposition in Indian Equity Market.
Santos, R., Dacanay, S., Jose, H., B, R., & Abueg, L. (2018). Essentials of Investments in the Philippine Capital Market.
Sehgal, S., Rakhyani, S., & Deisting, F. (2022). Does betting against beta strategy work in major Asian Markets? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 75, 101824.
Sørensen, S. (2015). Betting against beta-‐An empirical study.
Syrmas, V.-N. (2019). Betting against beta. Copenhagen Business School.
Wang, M. S., & Chen, T. Y. (2012). Market momentum, macroeconomic factors, and investor sentiment: Using the VAR model to evidence from Taiwan stock exchange. Journal of statistics and management systems, 15(1), 119-156.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.