Os efeitos da agilidade organizacional no desempenho organizacional
o trabalho mediativo da ambidexteridade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i2p114-123Palavras-chave:
Agility, Exploration, Exploitation, Ambidexterity, Organizational PerformanceResumo
As necessidades organizacionais cada vez maiores de dinamismo e progresso no desempenho e no produto realçaram o papel crucial da inovação nas organizações. No entanto, esta ênfase na inovação leva muitas vezes os gestores a ignorar os aspetos de eficiência das organizações ou a colocá-los na periferia da atenção. A importância da exploração e da exploração varia consoante as condições organizacionais. Este artigo tem como objetivo investigar a ambidestria organizacional como mediadora na influência da agilidade no desempenho da empresa. Embora a literatura aprecie um bom volume de trabalhos nas áreas do desempenho organizacional e da agilidade, ainda falta o apoio ao debate em torno dos dois lados da ambidestria, especialmente na área do equilíbrio entre exploração e exploração. Este estudo utiliza uma abordagem baseada em inquéritos online para recolher dados de 276 gestores de PME na Turquia para testar o modelo de investigação proposto. Os dados recolhidos foram analisados por análise de processo condicional utilizando a macro PROCESS for SPSS. No final, os resultados dos modelos confirmaram que a agilidade organizacional tem efeitos significativos no desempenho organizacional, e tanto a exploração como a exploração tiveram efeitos significativos no desempenho organizacional. O papel mediador da ambidestria foi também confirmado neste estudo.
Referências
Alamsjah, F., & Asrol, M. (2023). The impacts of middle managers' ambidexterity, continuous improvement, and organizational agility on business performance: A knowledge-based view. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.4610
Benn, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a team makes: A multilevel perspective on team dynamics and technology adoption in teams over time. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 13935-13935. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2014.13935abstract
Dash, I., Gupta, J. and Meher, J.R. (2024), "Deciphering HR challenges for organizational ambidexterity: a study on energy sector in India", International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 1204-1220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2022-3481
Denning, S. (2018). The age of agile: How smart companies are transforming the way work gets done. AMACOM. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Age_of_Agile.html?id=cGl9tAEACAAJ
Dove, R. (2001). Response-ability: The language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Response+Ability%3A+The+Language%2C+Structure%2C+and+Culture+of+the+Agile+Enterprise-p-9780471350187
Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic management practices into firm structure: How management frameworks facilitate agility and ambidexterity in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 561–585.
Dyer, J. H., & Ericksen, J. A. (2006). From supply chain to knowledge networks: The role of social capital in organizational performance. International Journal of Production Research, 44(19), 3921–3940.
Dyer, J. H., Fréchet, V., & Nair, A. N. (2014). Dynamic capabilities: A review toward future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1769–1775.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.
Fang E., Palmatier R.W., & Grewal D. (2014). Effects of Customer Participation on Customer Satisfaction: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 163-171.
Ghanizadeh, S., Ardabili, F. S., Kheirandish, M., Rasouli, E., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2022). Psychological Capital and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Organizacija, 55(3), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2022-0014
Hamel, G. (2012). What matters now: How to win in a world of relentless change, ferocious competition, and unstoppable innovation. Jossey-Bass.
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Jansen J.J.P., Van Den Bosch F.A.J., & Volberda H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation: A Study of a Sample of Dutch Firms. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 99-107.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Khan M.M.A.C.E.& Memon A. R. (2021). The Impact of Organizational Agility On Firm Performance: Evidence from Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems.
Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J., & Robben, H. S. (2004). The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2), 79-94.
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155.
Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931–954.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Ononiwu, M. I., Onwuzulike, O. C., & Shitu, K. (2024). The role of digital business transformation in enhancing organizational agility. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2670
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74-81.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 131-154.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Rakhshani, J., & Tamjid, H. (2022). Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Critical Thinking. European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, 24, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.32038/mbrq.2022.24.04
Rauch, M., Fink, M., & Hatak, I. (2022). Organizational agility: A dynamic capability’s influence on firm performance in turbulent environments. Journal of Business Research, 141, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.038
Rigby D.K., Sutherland J., & Takeuchi H. (2016). Embracing Agile; How to Transform Your Organization's Culture and Achieve Greater Innovation Through Agile Practices. Harvard Business Review.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms." The MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
Stei, G., Rossmann, A. and Szász, L. (2024), "Leveraging organizational knowledge to develop agility and improve performance: the role of ambidexterity", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(8), 1446-1466. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2023-0274
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. *Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Teece, D. J. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro-foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance." Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
Ürü, F. O., Gözükara, E., & Ünsal, A. A. (2024). Organizational Ambidexterity, Digital Transformation, and Strategic Agility for Gaining Competitive Advantage in SMEs. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1386357
Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. *Organization Science, 7(4), 359-374.
Waseel, A.H., Zhang, J., Shehzad, M.U., Hussain Sarki, I. and Kamran, M.W. (2024), "Navigating the innovation frontier: ambidextrous strategies, knowledge creation, and organizational agility in the pursuit of competitive excellence", Business Process Management Journal, 30(6), 2127-2160. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-02-2024-0081
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
