Densidade de investimento bancário e ESG
um caminho para reduzir a desigualdade de renda na sociedade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i3p81-98Palavras-chave:
Desigualdade de renda, Densidade de investimento bancário, ESG, Liquidez bancária, Volatilidade bancáriaResumo
Este estudo explora a influência das medidas de densidade de investimento bancário por investimento verde e sustentável, fintech e banco digital, inclusão financeira e equidade social, cidades inteligentes e infraestrutura no coeficiente de Gini e nos indicadores do índice de Theil de desigualdade de renda (ODS-10) na sociedade. O estudo revela que a densidade de investimento dos bancos para atividades de investimento sustentável ajuda significativamente a reduzir a desigualdade de renda. Além disso, descobrimos que a moderação da conformidade ambiental, social e de governança (ESG) variável reestruturou as práticas bancárias tradicionais para iniciativas sustentáveis para sustentabilidade de longo prazo. Da mesma forma, revelamos que a mediação da liquidez variável dos bancos canaliza positivamente os fundos para iniciativas de investimento sustentável. Ao mediar a volatilidade variável dos bancos, restringe a capacidade do banco de alocar fundos para projetos de investimento sustentável. Os gestores devem projetar práticas rigorosas de gerenciamento de risco para implementar efetivamente projetos de investimento sustentável para combater a desigualdade de renda na sociedade.
Referências
Almeida, D. V., Kolinjivadi, V., Ferrando, T., Roy, B., Herrera, H., Gonçalves, M. V., & Van Hecken, G. (2023). The “greening” of empire: The European Green Deal as the EU first agenda. Political Geography, 105, 102925.
Amalia, F., Muharam, H., & Pangestuti, I. R. D. (2024). Willingness to sacrifice to optimize financial and non-financial goals in ethical investing. Economic Studies, 33(8).
Balp, G., & Strampelli, G. (2022). Institutional investor ESG engagement: The European experience. European Business Organization Law Review, 23(4), 869-904.
Banks, M. (2018). Creative economies of tomorrow? Limits to growth and the uncertain future. Cultural trends, 27(5), 367-380.
Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2022). Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 777-812.
Bouteska, A., Bhuiyan, F., Sharif, T., & Abedin, M. Z. (2024). Contagion between investor sentiment and green bonds in China during the global uncertainties. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, 469-484.
Boyd, J., Epanchin-Niell, R., & Siikamäki, J. (2015). Conservation planning: a review of return on investment analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
Camilleri, M. A. (2021). The market for socially responsible investing: A review of the developments. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(3), 412-428.
Chatzitheodorou, K., Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., & Nikolaou, I. (2019). Exploring socially responsible investment perspectives: A literature mapping and an investor classification. Sustainable production and consumption, 19, 117-129.
Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V. (2022). Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: a quantile regression approach. The European Journal of Finance, 28(1), 86-107.
Dicuonzo, G., Donofrio, F., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Dell’Atti, V. (2022). The integration of sustainability in corporate governance systems: an innovative framework applied to the European systematically important banks. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 19(3), 249-263.
Dikau, S., & Volz, U. (2021). Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance. Ecological Economics, 184, 107022.
Dudley, E. (2012). Capital structure and large investment projects. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(5), 1168-1192.
Ferilli, G. B., Palmieri, E., Miani, S., & Stefanelli, V. (2024). The impact of FinTech innovation on digital financial literacy in Europe: Insights from the banking industry. Research in International Business and Finance, 69, 102218.
Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of management review, 24(2), 233-236.
Grassi, L., Figini, N., & Fedeli, L. (2022). How does a data strategy enable customer value? The case of FinTechs and traditional banks under the open finance framework. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 75.
Grossman, E., & Woll, C. (2014). Saving the banks: The political economy of bailouts. Comparative Political Studies, 47(4), 574-600.
Habib, A., Khan, M. A., Haddad, H., & Al-Ramahi, N. M. (2024). Does sustainable banking facilitate reducing the SDG-10 in weak rule of law setting? Heliyon, 10(2).
Habib, A., Khan, M. A., & Tangl, A. (2024). Integration of green finance with ESG compliance to enhance the firm value. Managerial approach to determining the level of liquidity. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(3), 1289-1300.
Harclerode, M. A., Macbeth, T. W., Miller, M. E., Gurr, C. J., & Myers, T. S. (2016). Early decision framework for integrating sustainable risk management for complex remediation sites: Drivers, barriers, and performance metrics. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 57-66.
Kara, A., Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Achieving the United Nations' sustainable development goals through financial inclusion: A systematic literature review of access to finance across the globe. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101833.
Liu, Z., Liang, H., & Liu, C. (2024). The effects of debt liquidity risk on firms' growth rate. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 20(1), 71-93.
Maalouf, E. (2024). Achieving corporate environmental responsibility through emerging sustainability laws. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 27(1), 64-99.
Malik, K., & Sharma, S. (2024). Role of ESG and private equity on environmental degradation: a nexus of opportunity and responsibility for developing and developed countries. Journal of Economic Studies.
Meng, J., Ye, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Financing and investing in sustainable infrastructure: A review and research agenda. Sustainable Futures, 100312.
Mishra, P., & Sant, T. G. (2024). Examine the level of environmental, social and governance disclosure in sustainability report–a study of the Indian banking sector. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(2), 420-442.
Popova, Y. (2021). Economic basis of digital banking services produced by FinTech Company in Smart City. Journal of Tourism and Services, 12(23), 86-104.
Roncoroni, A., Battiston, S., Escobar-Farfán, L. O., & Martinez-Jaramillo, S. (2021). Climate risk and financial stability in the network of banks and investment funds. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100870.
Sadiq, M., Nonthapot, S., Mohamad, S., Chee Keong, O., Ehsanullah, S., & Iqbal, N. (2022). Does green finance matter for sustainable entrepreneurship and environmental corporate social responsibility during COVID-19? China Finance Review International, 12(2), 317-333.
Scholtens, B. (2006). Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 19-33.
Song, P., Gu, Y., Su, B., Tanveer, A., Peng, Q., Gao, W., Wu, S., & Zeng, S. (2023). The Impact of Green Technology Research and Development (R&D) Investment on Performance: A Case Study of Listed Energy Companies in Beijing, China. Sustainability, 15(16), 12370.
Stulz, R. M. (2019). Fintech, bigtech, and the future of banks. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(4), 86-97.
Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96-116.
Torre Olmo, B., Cantero Saiz, M., & Sanfilippo Azofra, S. (2021). Sustainable banking, market power, and efficiency: Effects on banks’ profitability and risk. Sustainability, 13(3), 1298.
Urban, M. A., & Wójcik, D. (2019). Dirty banking: Probing the gap in sustainable finance. Sustainability, 11(6), 1745.
Vuong, G. T. H., Nguyen, Y. D. H., Nguyen, M. H., & Wong, W.-K. (2024). Assessing the impact of macroeconomic uncertainties on bank stability: Insights from ASEAN-8 countries. Heliyon, 10(11).
Wang, H., Xu, Q., & Yang, J. (2018). Investment timing and optimal capital structure under liquidity risk. The European Journal of Finance, 24(11), 889-908.
Yan, S., Ferraro, F., & Almandoz, J. (2019). The rise of socially responsible investment funds: The paradoxical role of the financial logic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(2), 466-501.
Yang, H.-F., Liu, C.-L., & Chou, R. Y. (2020). Bank diversification and systemic risk. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 311-326.
Yip, A. W., & Bocken, N. M. (2018). Sustainable business model archetypes for the banking industry. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 150-169.
Zabavnik, D., & Verbič, M. (2024). Unravelling the credit market shocks and investment dynamics: A theoretical and empirical perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 94, 103283.
Zhang, Y., & Dilanchiev, A. (2022). Economic recovery, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China: effect on green economic recovery. Resources Policy, 79, 102958.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
