Crip teleportation: the animal that therefore I am—or I am not
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-3585.2020i22p91-104Keywords:
Animal studies, Neurodiversity, Neurodivergence, Crip studies, DemirhetoricAbstract
This paper examines how disabled body-minds are discursively dehumanized or superhumanized. It draws on Critical Disability Studies and the Crip Studies scholarship and focuses on invisible mental disabilities, mainly those of the neurodiversity spectrum. The efforts of animalization and super-humanization draw on a mechanism that resonates with Parmenides’s Zeno paradox. As the autistic scholar Melanie Yergeau (2018) discusses, a neuroqueer body-mind is always in constant motion, being relocated from one identity category to another, from humanity to animality and vice-versa, subject to an excessively strict rhetoric model. Concomitantly, animals in slaughtering facilities are humanized to make their deaths seem smoother. To short-circuit the models that evaluate how fit human and animal bodies are for the neoliberal guidelines of productivity, the paper also brings Jasbir Puars’s intersectional approach on capacity and debility into the discussion.
References
BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61, 2018. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486.
BUTLER, Judith. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge, 2011.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. Precision ableism: a studies in ableism approach to developing histories of disability and abledment. Rethinking History, 23(2), 2019, p. 138–156. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2019.1607475.
DE HOOGE, Anna N. Binary boys: autism, aspie supremacy and post/ humanist normativity. Disability Studies Quarterly, 39(1), 2019. DOI: doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v39i1.6461.
DELEUZE, Gilles, & Guattari, Félix. Micropolitics and segmentarity. In: Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia, Trans. Brian Massumi, 208-31. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
DERRIDA, Jacques. The animal that therefore I am. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2008.
EVANS, Meg. The autistic genocide clock. In: KAPP, S. (ed.). Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
GRANDIN, Temple. Double rail restrainer conveyor for livestock handling. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 41(4), p. 327–338, 1988. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(88)90217-x.
HORTON, John. Failure failure failure failure failure failure: six types of failure within the neoliberal academy. Emotion, Space and Society, 35, 100672, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2020.100672.
KAPP, Steven K. (ed.). Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement: stories from the frontline. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
LINDGREN, Nicklas; ÖHMAN, Johan. A posthuman approach to humananimal relationships: advocating critical pluralism. Environmental Education Research, 25(8), p. 1200–1215, 2018. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/13504 622.2018.1450848.
LION, Vittoria. Disrupting Temple Grandin. In: S. Jenkins; K. Struthers Montford; C. Taylor (eds.). Disability and animality: crip perspectives in critical animal studies, p. 182–211. London: Routledge, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.4324/9781003014270-13.
MACKINNEY, Claire. Cripping the classroom: disability as a teaching method in the humanities. Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy, 25(2), p. 114–127, 2014. DOI: doi.org/10.1353/ tnf.2014.0024.
MACRUER, Robert. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York, NY: New York University Press, 2006.
MANNING, Erin. Always more than one: the individuation’s dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012.
MASSUMI, Brian. What animals can teach us about politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.
MATTHEWS, Malcolm. Why Sheldon Cooper can’t be black. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 13(1), p. 57–74, 2019. DOI: doi. org/10.3828/jlcds.2019.4.
NAPLES, Nancy. A., Mauldin, Laura., & Dillaway, Heather. From the guest editors: gender, disability, and intersectionality. Gender & Society, 33(1), p. 5–18, 2018. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/0891243218813309.
NICOLAIDIS, Christina. What can physicians learn from the neurodiversity movement? AMa Journal of Ethics, 14(6), p. 503-510, 2012. DOI: doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.6.oped1-1206.
PUAR, Jasbir. K. The right to maim: debility, capacity, disability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017.
READING, Anna. Neurodiversity and communication ethics: how images of autism trouble communication ethics in the globital age. Cultural Studies Review, 24(2), p. 113–129, 2018. DOI: doi.org/10.5130/csr. v24i2.6040.
SCHALK, Sami. Coming to claim crip: disidentification with/in disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(2), 2013.
SOMERS, Kelly; SOLDATIC, Karen. Productive bodies: how neoliberalism makes and unmakes disability in human and non-human animals. In: JENKINS, Stephanie; MONFORD, Kelly Struthers; TAYLOR, Chloë (ed.). Disability and animality: crip perspectives in critical animal studies, p. 35- 56. London: Routledge, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.4324/9781003014270-4.
STANESCU, Vasile; STANESCU, Debs. Lost in translation. In: JENKINS, Stephanie; MONFORD, Kelly Strthers; TAYLOR, Chloë (eds.). Disability and animality: crip perspectives in critical animal studies, p. 161–181. London: Routledge, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.4324/9781003014270-12.
TRENTO, Francisco B. A procedural space for failure. Research in Arts & Education, 2020 (2), p. 1-22. Disponível em: urn.fi/URN:NBN:fife2020072447600. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2020.
YERGEAU, Melanie. Authoring autism: on rhetoric and neurological queerness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2018.
YERGEAU, Melanie. Cassandra isn’t doing the robot: On risky rhetorics and contagious autism. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 50(3), p. 212–221, 2020. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2020.1752132.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo de acordo com a licença CC BY 4.0, em conformidade com a definição de acesso público do Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
Ao submeter um texto à TECCOGS, os autores asseguram que o material submetido à avaliação e eventual publicação não infringe de modo algum qualquer direito proprietário ou copyright de outros. Com a submissão, o autor transfere em efetivo os direitos de publicação do artigo para a TECCOGS. A transferência de copyright cobre os direitos exclusivos de publicação e distribuição do artigo, incluindo reimpressões ou quaisquer outras reproduções de natureza similar, além de traduções. Os autores mantém o direito de usar todo ou partes deste texto em trabalhos futuros de sua autoria e de conceder ou recusar a permissão a terceiros para republicar todo ou partes do texto ou de suas traduções. Para republicar números da revista na íntegra, qualquer interessado precisa obter permissão por escrito tanto dos autores como também dos editores da TECCOGS. A TECCOGS por si só pode conceder direitos relativos a emissões de periódicos como um todo.
Imagens com direitos autorais pertencentes a terceiros, que não foram concedidos ao autor do texto, devem ser utilizadas somente quando necessárias à análise e ao argumento da pesquisa, sempre indicando as respectivas fontes e autoria. A TECCOGS dispensa o uso de imagens meramente ilustrativas. Se desejar ilustrar um conceito, o autor deve indicar, em forma de URL ou referência bibliográfica, uma referência em que a ilustração esteja disponível.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This journal offers free immediate access to its content under CC BY 4.0, in accordance with Directory of Open Access Journals' (DOAJ) definition of Open Acess.
When submitting a text to TECCOGS, authors ensure that the material submitted for evaluation and eventual publication does not infringe any proprietary right or copyright. Upon submission, authors effectively transfer the publication rights of the article to TECCOGS. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights of publication and distribution of the article, including reprints or any other reproduction of similar nature, in addition to translations. Authors retain the right to use all or parts of the text in future works of their own, as well as to grant or refuse permission to third parties to republish all or parts of the text or its translations. In order to fully republish issues of the magazine, anyone interested must obtain written permission from both the authors and the editors of TECCOGS. TECCOGS alone can grant rights relating to issues of journals as a whole.
Images whose copyright belongs to third parties that have not been granted to the author of the text should be used only when essential for the analysis and argument, always indicating theirs respective sources and authorship. TECCOGS dismisses any use of merely illustrative images. To illustrate a concept, the author must indicate, in the form of a URL or bibliographic reference, a source in which the illustration is available.
