Quantum physics and culture:

mutual influences

Authors

  • Osvaldo Pessoa Jr

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-3585.2023i27p50-66

Keywords:

interpretation, quantum theory, culture, relativism

Abstract

A pedagogical exposition of quantum physics opens the article, highlighting the difference between the objective part of the theory and its interpretative part. A “realist wave interpretation with collapses” is adopted to present five basic principles of the theory. One then addresses the impact of quantum physics on society. Its great scientific and technological impact is discussed, and then its theoretical impact is examined more closely, in ontological and epistemological terms. It is argued that the ontological impact on our everyday lives is limited to technological applications, and that possible philosophical consequences of the uncertainty principle and indeterminism are not important, much less the consequences imagined by quantum mysticism in relation to entanglement. Among the epistemological lessons is that we know the interpretation that comes closest to the truth, but we do not know which one it is, among the dozens of proposed interpretations. Finally, we discuss Forman's thesis, which involves the question of whether science is objective or whether it is a socio-culturally negotiated construction, as defended by relativism. We conclude in favor of a "relative relativism": interpretations can be strongly influenced by culture, but in a healthy scientific context its objective part is able to isolate itself from social vicissitudes and from the emotional intentions of scientists. Finally, some examples of the influence of culture and other factors on the interpretations of quantum theory are given.

Author Biography

Osvaldo Pessoa Jr

Professor titular de Filosofia da Ciência no Departamento de Filosofia, FFLCH, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Graduação em Física (1982) e Filosofia (1984) pela USP, Mestrado em Física Experimental na Unicamp, em 1985, e Doutorado no Departamento de História & Filosofia da Ciência na Indiana University, EUA, com tese sobre o problema da medição na física quântica (1990). Publicou o livro Conceitos de física quântica (2003). Desenvolve pesquisa em filosofia da física, filosofia da mente e “modelos causais em história da ciência”, além de se interessar por ensino e divulgação científica. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-1719. Contato:
opessoa@usp.br.

References

ASPELMEYER, Markus, et al. Quantum optomechanics – throwing a glance. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Washington, DC, v. 27, n. 6, p. A189–A197, 2010.

BLOKHINTSEV, Dmitrii. Foundations of quantum mechanics. Moscow: GITTL, 1949.

BOHM, David. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables part I and II. Physical Review, College Park, MD, v. 85, n. 2, p. 166–193, 1952.

CUSHING, James T. Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

DEWITT, Bryce. Quantum mechanics and reality. Physics Today, v. 23, n. 9, p. 30–35, 1970.

EDDINGTON, Arthur. The decline of determinism: presidential address to the Mathematical Association. The Mathematical Gazette, Leicester, v. 16, n. 218, p. 66–80, 1932.

EVERETT III, Hugh. On the foundations of quantum mechanics. PhD Thesis submitted to the Princeton University, 1957.

FEIN, Yaakov, et al. Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kDa. Nature Physics, Berlin, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1242–1245, 2019.

FORMAN, Paul. A cultura de Weimar, a causalidade e a teoria quântica, 1918–1927: a adaptação de físicos e matemáticos alemães a um ambiente intelectual hostil. Tradução de C. W. Abramo. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, Suplemento 2, Campinas, p. 3–98, [1971] 1983.

FREIRE Jr., Olival. Marxism and quantum controversy: responding to Max Jammer’s question. In: CATTANI, Mary Schnackenberg et al. (orgs.). Trends in Physics: Festschrift in homage to prof. José Maria Filardo Bassalo. São Paulo: Livraria da Física, 2009, p. 237–258.

GHIRARDI, Giancarlo; RIMINI, Alberto; WEBER, Tullio. Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, Philadelphia, PA, v. 34, n. 2, p. 470-491, 1986.

JAMMER, Max. The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1966.

KEMBLE, Edwin C. The fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1937.

LANDÉ, Alfred. 1951. Quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.

MARGENAU, Henry; MURPHY, George M. The mathematics of physics of chemistry. New York, NY: Van Nostrand, 1946.

MÉCANIQUE quantique: l’erreur d’Einstein. La recherche, Paris, v. 418, 2008.

PESSOA Jr., Osvaldo. A psicologia precisa da teoria quântica? Calibán — Revista Latino-Americana de Psicanálise, Montevideo, v. 14, n. 2, p. 145–152, 2016.

SLATER, John. A dynamical model for complex atoms. Physical Review, College Park, MD, v. 28, p. 291–317, 1926.

TEGMARK, Max. Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E, College Park, MD, v. 61, p. 4194–4206, 2000.

Published

2023-12-15