Scientific pride and metaphysical prejudice

ens quantum ens, quantum theory, and Peirce

Authors

  • Rosa Mayorga Miami-Dade Community College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-3585.2024i2930p269-294

Keywords:

Pride, prejudice, metaphysics, Quantum theory, Peirce

Abstract

Metaphysicians and physicists both share the proud desire to understand the world and all the things in it, to fully comprehend the nature of reality. Almost one hundred years after it was proposed, quantum theory has radically transformed the science of physics, inviting a conception of reality that is drastically at odds with our most rooted metaphysical convictions. A scientist and metaphysician extraordinaire, Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) was singularly poised to recognize some of the “metaphysical prejudices” about the world that quantum theory, developed years later, has revealed. This article proposes to trace how Peirce’s realism, inspired by the thirteenth-century Franciscan monk John Duns Scotus (c. 1266–1308) and adapted for a recon-ceived scientific metaphysics, parallels some of the familiar enigmas posed by quantum physics in the early twenty-first century.

Author Biography

Rosa Mayorga, Miami-Dade Community College

Rosa Mayorga é professora de filosofia em Miami-Dade Community College. Especialista em metafísica e filosofia medieval e renascentista. Escreveu várias obras sobre o realismo na filosofia de C. S. Peirce. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7501-1281 E-mail: rmayorga@mdc.edu.

References

OERSEMA, David. Metaphysics. In: American philosophy: An encyclopedia. LACHS, John; TALISSE Robert (eds.). New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.

BOLER, John F. Charles Sanders Peirce and scholastic realism. Seattle, WA: Washington University Press, 1963.

CAPRA, Fritjof. The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York, NY: Anchor Books, 1996.

CHWE, Michael Suk-Young. Scientific pride and prejudice. New York Times, January 31, 2014. https:// www.nyti mes.com/ 2014/02/02/opinion/sun day/scientific-pride-and-prejudice.html

CROSS, Richard. Duns Scotus: Some recent research. Journal of the History of Philosophy, Baltimore, MD, v. 49, n. 3 (July), p. 271–295, 2011.

De Waal, Cornelis de (ed.). Oxford handbook of Charles Sanders Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.

DUNS SCOTUS, John. Ordinatio. In Opera omnia, Charles Balic (ed.), v. 1-14. Vatican City: Vatican Polyglot Press, 1950-2-13.

DUNS SCOTUS, John. Questions on the metaphysics of Aristotle. Translation: Girard J. Etzkorn; Allan Wolter, O.F.M. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1997.

FERNANDEZ, Eliseo. Peirce in 21st century science and philosophy: New prospects, 2008. Disponível em: https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/menu/library/aboutcsp/fernandez/efpa-pers.htm.

HAACK, Susan. Extreme scholastic realism: Its relevance to philosophy of science today. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society, Indianapolis, v. 28, n.1 (Winter), p. 19-50, 1992.

HAACK, Susan. The differences that make a difference: William James on the importance of individuals. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, Paris, v. 2, n.1, p. 1-10, 2010.

HAACK, Susan. The world and how we know it: Stumbling toward an understanding. Journal of Critical Realism, London, v. 19, n.1, p. 78-88.

HAACK, Susan. Scientistic philosophy, no; Scientific philosophy, yes. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Tabriz, v. 15, n. 36 (autumn 2021), p. 4– 35, 2021.

HARTSHORNE, Charles. Charles Sanders Peirce and quantum mechanics. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society, Indianapolis, v. 9, n. 4, 1973, p. 191-201.

INGHAM, Mary Beth; DREYER, Mechthild. The philosophical theology of John Duns Scotus. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2004.

KRAAIJEVELD, Steven R. Jane Austen and cognitive bias, May 19, 2019. https://stevenrkraaijeveld.com/blog/jane-austen-and-cognitive-bias, 2019.

LABATUT, Benjamin. When we cease to understand the world. Translation: Adrian Nathan West. New York, NY: New York Review Books, 2020.

LANE, Robert. Peirce on realism and idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

LAZELLA, Andrew. The singular voice of being: John Duns Scotus and ultimate difference. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2019.

MAYORGA, Rosa Maria Perez-Teran. From realism to realicism: The metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007.

MAYORGA, Rosa Maria. Metaphysics, religion, and death, or we’ll always have Paris. Cosmos + Taxis: Studies in Emergent Order and Organization, Okanagan, v. 8, n. 4-5, p. 49-59, 2020.

MAYORGA, Rosa Maria. Peirce’s moral realicism. In: DE WAAL, Cornelis de; SKOWRONSKI, Krzysztof Piotr (eds.). The normative thought of Charles Sanders Peirce, p. 101-124. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2008a.

MAYORGA, Rosa Maria. Realism: scholastic. In LACHS, John; TALISSE, Robert (eds.). American philosophy: An encyclopedia, p. 651– 652. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008b.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. 1931–1 958. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols., Hartshorne, Charles; Weiss, Paul (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958. (Referido como CP.)

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Houser, Nathan; Kloesel, Christian; Peirce Edition Project (eds.), 2 vols. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1992; 1998. Referido como EP, seguindo do número do vol.

Published

2025-03-19