Objectivity in Social Inquiry
a discussion between pragmatism and logical empiricism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e56666Abstract
Otto Neurath and John Dewey share the understanding that science must have a prominent role in democratic social reform. This is a common aim that brought logical empiricism and pragmatism together in the first half of the 20th century, but there are differences between the two stances. On the one hand, Neurath sees a limitation of scientific knowledge, considering that it cannot determine decisions to be taken in the course of social reform. Such decisions, in the logical empiricist view, are a matter of politics. On the other hand, Dewey sees a continuity among all forms of inquiry and, therefore, the conclusions of valuational inquiry are analogous in their epistemic claims to the conclusions in factual (natural or social inquiry). This paper investigates the divergence and concludes that pragmatist continuity of inquiry is set in a psychological context that disregards a difference in objectivity between factual and valuational inquiry.
Metrics
References
CAPPS, John. The Less Said The Better: Dewey, Neurath, and Mid-Century Theories of Truth. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, [S. l.], v. 104, n. 1, p. 164-191, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2019-0081.
CARNAP, Rudolf. Truth and confirmation. In: FEIGL, Herbert; SELLARS, Wilfrid (Ed.). Readings in philosophical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949. p. 119-127.
CARNAP, Rudolf. Kaplan on value judgments. In: SCHILPP, Paul A. (Ed.). The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle: Open Court, 1963. p. 999-1013.
CARTWRIGHT, Nancy; CAT, Jordi; FLECK, Lola; UEBEL, Thomas. Otto Neurath: philosophy between science and politics. Ideas in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
CUNNINGHAM, Frank. Objectivity in social science. Toronto: Toronto University Press, [1973] 2017.
CUPANI, Alberto. Sobre a ciência. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC, 2018.
DA CUNHA, Ivan Ferreira. John Dewey and the logical empiricist unity of science. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, São Paulo. v. 13, n. 2, p. 219-230, Jul./Dec. 2012.
DA CUNHA, Ivan Ferreira. Neurath’s Social Sciences: between positivism and pragmatism. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, São Paulo, v. 15, n. 2, p. 315-332, 2014.
DAMBÖCK, Christian. The politics of Carnap’s Non-Cognitivism and the Scientific World-Conception of Left-Wing Logical Empiricism. Perspectives on Science, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 4, p. 493-524, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00372.
DASTON, Lorraine; GALISON, Peter. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.
DEWEY, John. Experience and nature. New York: Dover, [1929] 1958.
DEWEY, John. Human nature and conduct. New York: Prometheus, [1922] 2002.
DEWEY, John. The quest for certainty. In: BOYDSTON, Jo Ann. (Ed.). The later works of John Dewey, v. 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, [1929] 2008.
DEWEY, John. Unity of science as a social problem. In: NEURATH, Otto; CARNAP, Rudolf; MORRIS, Charles (Ed.). International encyclopedia of unified science. v. 1. Chicago: Chicago University Press, [1938] 1955. p. 29-38.
DEWEY, John. Logic: the theory of inquiry. In: BOYDSTON, Jo Ann. (Ed.). The later works of John Dewey, v. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, [1938] 2008.
DEWEY, John. Theory of valuation. In: NEURATH, Otto; CARNAP, Rudolf; MORRIS, Charles. (Ed.). Foundations of the unity of science: toward an international encyclopedia of unified science. v. 2. Chicago: Chicago University Press, [1939] 1970. p. 379-447.
DEWEY, John. Creative democracy: the task before us. In: BOYDSTON, Jo Ann. (Ed.). The later works of John Dewey. v. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1939/2008. p. 224-230.
DI BERARDINO, M. A. Acuerdos enciclopédicos: Dewey y Neurath sobre ciencia y valores. Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época, [S. l.], n. 13, p. 17-33, 2018. DOI: 10.35305/cf2.vi13.20.
LACEY, Hugh. Valores e atividade científica. São Paulo: Discurso, 1998.
LACEY, Hugh. Valores e atividade científica 2. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2010.
LIMBECK-LILIENAU, Christoph. Carnap’s Encounter with Pragmatism. In: CREATH, Richard (Ed.). Rudolf Carnap and the legacy of logical empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. v. 16. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012. p. 89-110.
LINSBICHLER, Alexander. The fact/value dichotomy as an alleged thought-stopper. In: DAMBÖCK, Christian; SCHIEMER, Georg (Ed.). Handbuch Rudolf Carnap / Rudolf Carnap Handbook. Heidelberg: J. B. Metzler Verlag, 2022. Forthcoming.
MISAK, Cheryl. The American pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
NEMETH, Elisabeth. Neurath’s Utopias: the will to hope. In: UEBEL, Thomas (Ed.). Rediscovering the forgotten Vienna Circle. Dordrecht: Kluwer, [1982] 1991. p. 284-292.
NEURATH, Otto. Die Utopie als gesellschaftstechnische Konstruktion. In: HEGSELMANN, Rainer (ed.). Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus und logischer Empirismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, [1919] 1979. p. 235-241.
NEURATH, Otto. Utopien. In: HALLER, Rudolf; RUTTE, Heiner. (ed.). Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften, v. 1. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, [1919] 1981. p.137-138.
NEURATH, Otto. Protocol Statements. In: COHEN, Robert; NEURATH, Marie (ed.). Otto Neurath Philosophical Papers 1913-1946. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, [1932] 1983. p. 91-99.
NEURATH, Otto. Foundations of the social sciences. In: NEURATH, Otto; CARNAP, Rudolf; MORRIS, Charles. (ed.). Foundations of the unity of science: toward an international encyclopedia of unified science, v. 2. Chicago: Chicago University Press, [1944] 1970. p. 1-47.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Truth and falsity and error. In: BALDWIN, James M. Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, v. 2. London: Macmillan, p. 716-720, 1902. Available: http://www.commens.org/bibliography/collection_article/peirce-charles-s-1902-truth-and-falsity-and-error-dictionary. Accessed on 30 set. 2019.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce. v. 1. HOUSER, Nathan; KLOESEL, Christian. (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. [Cited as volume (v), page (p) (EP v:p)].
PIHLSTRÖM, Sami; STADLER, Friedrich; WEIDTMANN, Niels. (ed.). Logical empiricism and pragmatism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, v. 19. Cham: Springer, 2017.
PUTNAM, Ruth Anna. Dewey’s Epistemology. In: COCHRAM, Molly (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Dewey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 34-54.
REISCH, George. Doomed in advance to defeat?: John Dewey on logical empiricism, reductionism, and values. In: NEMETH, Elisabeth; ROUDET, Nicolas (ed.). Paris-Wien: Enzyklopädien im Vergleich. Wien: Springer, 2005a. p. 241-251.
REISCH, George. How the Cold War transformed philosophy of science: to the icy slopes of logic. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005b.
RICHARDSON, Alan. Engineering philosophy of science: American pragmatism and logical empiricism in the 1930s. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, S36-S47, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/341766
RICHARDSON, Alan. Philosophy of science in America. In: MISAK, Cheryl (ed.). The Oxford handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 339-374.
RUSSELL, Bertrand. The impact of science on society. New York: Routledge, [1952] 1985.
UEBEL, Thomas. Calculation in kind and marketless socialism: on Otto Neurath’s utopian economics. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, v. 15, n. 3, p. 475-501, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560802252354
UEBEL, Thomas. American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: the early years. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 3, p.1-35, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v3i3.39
UEBEL, Thomas. Intersubjective accountability: politics and philosophy in the left Vienna Circle. Perspectives on Science, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 35-62, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00332
VOSSOUGHIAN, Nader. Otto Neurath: the language of the global polis. Rotterdam: Nai, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
