Further reflections on Peirce’s Scotism

Authors

  • Michael Raposa Lehigh University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e58358

Abstract

This article explores the various ways in which Charles Peirce adapted some of John Duns Scotus’s ideas for his own philosophical purposes. Extending beyond the much-explored territory defined by Peirce’s and Scotus’s common embrace of scholastic realism, the purpose here is to identify and explore a variety of ways in which Peirce’s thought may have been shaped by Scotus’s conclusions. Peirce’s Scotism can be discerned in the careful examination of a diversity of topics: the pragmatic consequences of a commitment to realism, semiosis conceived as an essentially ordered process, abduction as form of abstraction, and the essentially practical nature of theological inquiry are the particular topics emphasized here. In each instance, there is clear evidence that Scotus’s original conceptions have been creatively transformed within the context of Peirce’s philosophy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BOLER, John F. Charles Peirce and scholastic realism: a study of Peirce’s relation to John Duns Scotus. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1963.

CÁRDENAS, Paniel Reyes. Scholastic realism: a key to understanding Peirce’s philosophy. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2018.

MAYORGA, Rosa. From realism to “realicism”: the metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007.

PEIRCE, Benjamin. Ideality in the physical sciences. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1881.

PEIRCE, Charles S. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. HARTSHORNE, Charles. WEISS, Paul (Eds.). v. 1-6. BURKS, Arthur W (Ed.). v. 7-8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1935; and 1958. 8 v.

_____. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. Peirce Edition Project (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998. v. 2.

PERLER, Dominik. Duns Scotus and Signification. Medieval philosophy and theology, v. 3, p. 97-120, 1993.

RAPOSA, Michael L. Peirce’s philosophy of religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.

RAPOSA, Michael L. Theosemiotic: religion, reading, and the gift of meaning. New York: Fordham University Press, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Raposa, M. (2022). Further reflections on Peirce’s Scotism. Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia, 23(1), e58358. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e58358