Indeterminacy and final causation in the process of sign determination

Priscila Monteiro Borges; Juliana Rocha Franco

doi:10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59925

Authors

Priscila Monteiro Borges Universidade de Brasília
Juliana Rocha Franco Universidade Estadual de Minas Gerais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2022v23i1:e59925

Abstract

In semiotics, final causation can be related to the process of determination (PAPE, 1993). From Peirce’s point of view, determination is not a causal determinism, but a delimitation of a range of possibilities. One starts from objects towards interpretants, in a process mediated by the sign, in which the dynamic object works as a force that constrains interpretants to correspond to their objects. The correspondence between object and interpretant is important because it is through a generated interpretant that the object of a sign can be known. Even though this process of determination coincides with the idea of final causation, there is a certain indeterminacy in it. For Peirce (EP 2:353, 1905), vagueness and generality are two types of indeterminacy. In the terms of the phenomenological categories, vagueness is an indeterminacy of the order of firstness, generality an indeterminacy of the order of thirdness, and both, to some extent, are opposed to that which is defined, which belongs to secondness. Each aspect of the sign may vary according to the three phenomenological categories. Consequently, degrees of imprecision are added to the semiotic process, which is a determination process. Peirce asserts that the perfect precision of thought is theoretically unattainable (SS 11, 1903). Every sign is vague or general at least to some degree. In this paper, we seek to perceive degrees of indetermination and causality from an analysis of the kinds of objects and interpretants proposed by Peirce in the system of 28 sign classes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BORGES, Priscila. Mensagens cifradas: a criação de linguagens diagramáticas. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação e Semiótica) – Programa de Comunicação e Semiótica, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2010.

BORGES, Priscila. Peirce’s System of 66 Classes of Signs. In: THELLEFSEN, Torkild; SØRENSEN, Bent (Org.). Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words. Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2014. p. 571-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614516415.507

BORGES, Priscila. A System of 21 Classes of Signs as an Instrument of Inquiry. The American Journal of Semiotics, v. 31, n. 3-4, p. 245-276, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2016153

BORGES, Priscila; FRANCO, Juliana R. Causalidade, classes naturais e Interpretantes Finais. Uma abordagem semiótica para a causação final. In: ARAÚJO, Arthur (Org.). Pragmatismo, semiótica, filosofia da mente e filosofia da neurociência. São Paulo: ANPOF, 2019. p. 85-93.

CARUS, Paul. Mr. Charles S. Peirce’s Onslaught on the Doctrine of Necessity. The Monist, v. 2, n. 4, p. 560-582, 1892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18922428

CARUS, Paul. The Founder of Tychism, His Methods, Philosophy, and Criticisms: In Reply to Mr. Charles S. Peirce. The Monist, v. 3, n. 4, p. 571-622, 1893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18933420

FARIAS, Priscila; QUEIROZ, João. On Diagrams for Peirce’s 10, 28, and 66 Classes of Signs, Semiotica, v. 147, p. 165-184, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2003.089

FRANCO, Juliana Rocha; BORGES, Priscila M. O real na filosofia de Charles S. Peirce. Teccogs: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, TIDD | PUC-SP, São Paulo, n. 12, p. 66-91, jul-dez. 2015.

FRANCO, Juliana Rocha; BORGES, Priscila M. Potencialidades Heurísticas dos Diagramas Dedutivos: uma abordagem peirceana. In: ARAÚJO, Arthur; CORREIA, Adriano; GHIRALDELLI, Paulo; MOGRABI, Gabriel. (Org.). Pragmatismo, Filosofia da Mente e Neurociência. v. 1. 1ed. São Paulo: Anpof, 2017. p. 59-77.

FRANCO, Juliana Rocha; BORGES, Priscila M. Diagrammatic relations of probative strength and inferential progression through semiotics. Semiotica, v. 228, p. 77-89, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0088

HULSWIT, M. A short history of causation. S.E.E.D. Journal (Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development), v. 4, n. 3, p. 16-42, 2004.

FRANCO, Juliana Rocha; BORGES, Priscila M. From cause to causation: A Peircean perspective (Vol. 90). Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.

FRANCO, Juliana Rocha; BORGES, Priscila M. Peirce’s teleological approach to natural classes. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 33(3), p.722-772, 1997.

JAMES, William. The will to believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1896.

MÜLLER, Ralf. On the Principles of Construction and the Order of Peirce’s Trichotomies of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 30, n. 1, p. 135-153, 1994.

PAPE, Helmut. Final Causality in Peirce’s Semiotics and his Classification of the Sciences. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 29, n. 4, p. 581-607, 1993.

PEIRCE, Charles S. The doctrine of necessity examined. The Monist, v. 2, n. 3, p. 321-337, 1892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18922321

PEIRCE, Charles S. Reply to the necessitarians: Rejoinder to Dr. Carus. The Monist, v. 3, n. 4, p. 526-570, 1893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18933412

PEIRCE, Charles S. Necessity. In: BALDWIN, J. M. (Ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. II. London: Macmillan and Co, 1902a. p. 143-146.

PEIRCE, Charles S. Vague. In: BALDWIN, J. M. (Ed.), Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. II. London: Macmillan and Co, 1902b. p. 143-146.

PEIRCE, Charles S. What Pragmatism Is. The Monist, v. 15, n. 2, p. 161-181, 1905a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist190515230

PEIRCE, Charles S. The issues of pragmaticism. The Monist, v. 15, n. 4, p. 481-499, 1905b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19051544

PEIRCE, Charles S. Prolegomena to an Apology of Pragmaticism. The Monist, v. 16, n. 4, p. 492-546, October 1906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist190616436

PEIRCE, Charles S. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. HARTSHORNE, Charles. WEISS, Paul (Eds.). v. 1-6. BURKS, Arthur W (Ed.). v. 7-8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1935; and 1958. 8 v.

PEIRCE, Charles S. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. HOUSER, Nathan; KLOESEL, Christian; Peirce Edition Project (Eds.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1992; 1998. 2 v.

PEIRCE, Charles S. New elements of mathematics. EISELE, C. (Ed.), The Hague: Mouton Press, 1976. 5 v.

PEIRCE, Charles S. Logic Notebook (1865-1909). In: PEIRCE, Charles S. The Charles S. Peirce Papers, Microfilm Edition, thirty reels with two supplementary reels later added. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Library Photographic Service, 1966.

PEIRCE, Charles S.; WELBY, Victoria. Semiotic and significs: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby. HARDWICK, Charles S. (ed.). Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1977.

RANSDELL, Joseph. Some leading ideas of Peirce’s semiotic. Semiotica. v. 19, n. 3-4, p. 157-178, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1977.19.3-4.157

SANTAELLA, Lucia. Os significados pragmáticos da mente e o sinequismo em Peirce. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, n. 3, p. 97-106, 2002.

SANDERS, Gary. Peirce’s Sixty-six Signs?. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 6, n. 1. p. 3-16, 1970.

WEISS, Paul; BURKS, Arthur. Peirce’s Sixty-six Signs. Journal of Philosophy, v. 42, n. 14, p. 383-388, 1945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2019195