Hermenêutica e interpretação “transfigurativa”: um affaire entre Danto e Ricœur

Vinicius Oliveira Sanfelice

doi:10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e60743

Authors

Vinicius Oliveira Sanfelice UNICAMP/FAPESP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e60743

Abstract

This paper analyzes Arthur C. Danto's critique of hermeneutics as a theory that, according to him, incurs in a notion of "deep interpretation" that excludes reference to the artist. Despite this criticism, we will analyze the proximity between a notion of interpretation from Paul Ricœur's hermeneutics to the notion of interpretation that Danto proposes in his theory of art. Our focus is the notion of "transfigurative" interpretation that concerns the transformation of the ordinary object into a work of art. This contribution of Danto to the analysis of the work of art allows us to bring together his and Ricœur's notion of interpretation by what they have in common: the emphasis on the questioning of the real through the work of art and on how the work is constituted through an interpretation and a transfiguration. Danto and Ricœur approach works by referring to notions of interpretation that result in processes of redescription and transfiguration.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Vinicius Oliveira Sanfelice, UNICAMP/FAPESP

Hermenêutica e estética

References

BRAND, Peg; BRAND, Myles. Surface and deep interpretation. In: ROLLINS, Mark. Danto and his critics. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. p. 69-83.

CARROLL, Noël. Essence, Expression, and History. In: ROLLINS, Mark. Danto and his critics. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. p. 118-145.

DANTO, Arthur C. A apreciação e a interpretação de obras de arte. In: DANTO, Arthur C. O descredencia- mento filosófico da arte. Trad. Rodrigo Duarte. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2014a. p. 57-80.

DANTO, Arthur C. A transfiguração do lugar-comum: uma filosofia da arte. Trad. Vera Pereira. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2005.

DANTO, Arthur C. Interpretação profunda. In: DANTO, Arthur C. O descredenciamento filosófico da arte. Trad. Rodrigo Duarte. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2014b. p. 81-102.

FREUD, Sigmund. “O Moisés, de Michelangelo”. In: FREUD, Sigmund. Arte, literatura e os artistas. Trad. Ernani Chaves. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2015b. p. 183-219.

FREUD, Sigmund. Uma lembrança de infância de Leonardo da Vinci. In: FREUD, Sigmund. Arte, literatura e os artistas. Trad. Ernani Chaves. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2015a. p. 69-165.

NASCIMENTO, Charliston Pablo do. O problema da interpretação das obras de arte no pensamento de Ar- thur Danto. Doispontos, v. 15, n. 2, p. 145-160, 2018. [https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v15i2.62711].

RICŒUR, Paul. A Crítica e a Convicção. Trad. António Hall. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1995. RICŒUR, Paul. A metáfora viva. Trad. Dion Davi Macedo. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2000.

RICŒUR, Paul. Architecture et Narrativité. Études Ricœuriennes/Ricœur Studies, v. 7, n. 2, p. 20-30, 2016. [https://doi.org/10.5195/ERRS.2016.377].

RICŒUR, Paul. Art, langage et herméneutique esthétique. In: RICŒUR, Paul. Philosophie, Éthique et poli- tique. Paris: Seuil, 2017. p. 191-219. Entrevista realizada por Jean-Marie Brohm e Magali Uhl (publicada originalmente pela revista Prétentaine 6, “Esthétique”), 1996.

RICŒUR, Paul. La fonction herméneutique de la distanciation. In: RICŒUR, Paul. Du texte à l’action: essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Seuil, 1986. p. 101-117.

RICŒUR, Paul. La métaphore vive. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1975.

RICŒUR, Paul. Temps et récit. Tome I: l’intrigue et le récit historique. Paris: Seuil, 1983.

RICŒUR, Paul. The Function of Fiction in Shaping Reality. Man and World, v. 12, n. 2, p. 123-141, 1979. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252461].

SONTAG, Susan. Contra a interpretação. Trad. Ana Maria Capovilla. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 1987.