Autonomia, liberdade e unidade nas leituras da Ciência da Lógica, e sua continuidade pelo Grupo Hegel e o idealismo especulativo – laboratório Hegel

Ricardo Pereira Tassinari; Gabriel Rodrigues da  Silva; Guilherme Marcelo de Brito Sanazaria

doi:10.23925/2316-5278.2024v25i1:e68535

Authors

Ricardo Pereira Tassinari Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"
Gabriel Rodrigues da Silva Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"
Guilherme Marcelo de Brito Sanazaria Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2024v25i1:e68535

Keywords:

Autonomy, Bildung, Education, Freedom, Hegel, Science of Logic

Abstract

This article aims to briefly describe the form and results of the participation of the Hegel and Speculative Idealism Group (GHIE) in the VI and VII Readings of Hegel's Logic 2022 and 2023 (VI and VII LLH). The motivation for its elaboration was to report the positive results achieved, in particular, due to the continuation of the new study and research format adopted by GHIE, based on the IV Readings of Hegel's Logic 2020 – Homage to the 250th anniversary of Hegel's birth: Stuttgart 1770 – 2020 (IV LLH). Said results were: (1) the seminars themselves presented at GHIE, which were recorded, as well as the presentations at the VI and VII LLH; (2) the texts of the VI LLH, published in the book Ser Para Si: Dialética entre Idealidade e Realidade (organized by A. Bavaresco, J. Tauchen, J. S. Jung; Porto Alegre, Editora Fundação Fênix, 2022), and the texts of the VII LLH, published in this magazine, of which this article is part; (3) the education (Bildung) of participants, in particular, due to the new format; (4) the continuity of a new way of proceeding with studies and research at GHIE, established since its participation in the IV LLH. Here, the last two items are highlighted mainly due the results obtained: (1) a deep and intense study and research of the text in question by the authors of the presentations; (2) the acquisition of more autonomy and more maturity of said authors; (3) deeper learning and education of the participants in the presentations (authors and commentators); (4) the exercise of working with different interpretations, and seeking a certain unity; and (5) continuity by the GHIE of the new form of study and research, which was incorporated and began to influence those that followed, in particular regarding participation in the VI and VII LLH. Therefore, a new dynamic was established and consolidated, due to all these positive results listed.