Peirce and modal logic
delta existential graphs and pragmaticism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2025v26i1:e60449Keywords:
Existential Graphs, Modal logic, Peirce, Possible worlds semantics, PragmaticismAbstract
Although modern modal logic came about largely after Peirce's death, he anticipated some of its key aspects, including strict implication and possible worlds semantics. He developed the Gamma part of Existential Graphs with broken cuts signifying possible falsity, but later identified the need for a Delta part without ever spelling out exactly what he had in mind. An entry in his personal Logic Notebook is a plausible candidate, with heavy lines representing possible states of things where propositions denoted by attached letters would be true, rather than individual subjects to which predicates denoted by attached names are attributed as in the Beta part. New transformation rules implement various commonly employed formal systems of modal logic, which are readily interpreted by defining a possible world as one in which all the relevant laws for the actual world are facts, each world being partially but accurately and adequately described by a closed and consistent model set of propositions. In accordance with pragmaticism, the relevant laws for the actual world are represented as strict implications with real possibilities as their antecedents and conditional necessities as their consequents, corresponding to material implications in every possible world.References
BURGESS, John P. Which modal logic is the right one? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, v. 40, n. 1, p. 81-93, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1039096306
CARNAP, Rudolf. Modalities and quantification. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 11, n. 2, p. 33-64, 1946. https://doi.org/10.2307/2268610
COPELAND, B. Jack. The genesis of possible worlds semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, v. 31, p. 99-137, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015273407895
DUNN, J. Michael. A truth value semantics for modal logic. In: LEBLANC, H. (Ed.). Truth, syntax and modality. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1973. p. 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71535-0
GARDIES, Jean-Louis. Basic logic for ontic and deontic modalities. Logica Trianguli, v. 2, p. 31-47, 1998.
GOBLE, Louis F. A simplified semantics for modal logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, v. 14, n. 2, p. 151-174, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093890890
HINTIKKA, Jaakko. Models for modalities: Selected essays. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969.
HUGHES, G. E.; CRESSWELL, M. J. A new introduction to modal logic. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
LEMMON, E. J. New foundations for Lewis modal systems. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 22, n. 2, p. 176-186, 1957. https://doi.org/10.2307/2964179
LEWIS, C. I. Implication and the algebra of logic. Mind, v. 21, n. 84, p. 522-531, 1912. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XXI.84.522
MA, Minghui; PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. Gamma graph calculi for modal logics. Synthese, v. 195, p. 3621-3650, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1390-3
PARRY, W. T. Review. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 18, n. 4, p. 327-329, 1953.
PEIRCE, Charles S. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. HARTSHORNE, Charles, and WEISS, Paul (Eds.). v. 1-6. BURKS, Arthur W. (Ed.), v. 7-8. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958. 8 v.
PEIRCE, Charles S. The new elements of mathematics. Carolyn Eisele (Ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 1976. 4 v.
PEIRCE, Charles S. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. FISCH, Max H. et. al (Eds.). v. 1-6 & 8. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1982-2010. 7 v.
PEIRCE, Charles S. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. HOUSER, Nathan; KLOESEL, Christian (Eds.). v. 1. Peirce Edition Project (Ed.). v. 2. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, 1998. 2 v.
PEIRCE, Charles S. Logic of the future: Writings on existential graphs. PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko (Ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021-2024. 3 v.
PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. Peirce’s contributions to possible-worlds semantics. Studia Logica, v. 82, n. 3, p. 345-369, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-8102-1
PIETARINEN, Ahti-Veikko. Two papers on existential graphs by Charles Peirce. Synthese, v. 192, n. 4, p. 881-922, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0498-y
POLLOCK, John L. Basic modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, v. 12, n. 3, p. 355-365, 1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270778
PORTE, Jean. Congruences in Lemmon’s S0.5. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, v. 21, n. 4, p. 672-678, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093883250
RAMHARTER, Esther, and GOTTSCHALL, Christian. Peirce’s search for a graphical modal logic (propositional part). History and Philosophy of Logic, v. 32, n. 2, p. 153-176, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2010.543840
ROBERTS, Don D. The existential graphs of Charles S. Peirce. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.
ROBIN, Richard S. Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1967. http://www.iupui.edu/~peirce/robin/rcatalog.htm
SCHMIDT, Jon A. Peirce’s maxim of pragmatism: 61 formulations. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 56, n. 4, p. 580-599, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.4.04
SCHMIDT, Jon A. Temporal synechism: A Peircean philosophy of time. Axiomathes, v. 32, p. 233-269, 2022a. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-020-09523-6
SCHMIDT, Jon A. Peirce and Łukasiewicz on modal and multi-valued logics. Synthese, v. 200, n. 275, p. 1-18, 2022b. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03755-2
SCHMIDT, Jon A. Enhancing existential graphs: Peirce’s late improvements. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 60, n. 2, p. 187-204, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2979/csp.00026
SOWA, John F. Laws, facts, and contexts: Foundations for multimodal reasoning. In: HENDRICKS, Vincent F., JØRGENSEN, Klaus F.; PEDERSEN, Stig A. (Eds.), Knowledge contributors. Dordrecht: Springer, 2003. p. 151-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1001-6_7
STARR, William B. Indicative conditionals, strictly. Ithaca: Cornell University, 2014. https://williamstarr.net/research/indicative_conditionals_strictly.pdf
VAN DEN BERG, Harmen. Modal logics for conceptual graphs. In: MINEAU, G. W.; MOULIN, B.; SOWA, J. F. (Eds.), Conceptual graphs for knowledge representation. Berlin: Springer, 1993. p. 411-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56979-0_23
ZEMAN, J. Jay. The graphical logic of C. S. Peirce. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1964. https://isidore.co/calibre/get/pdf/4481
ZEMAN, Jay. Peirce and Philo. In: HOUSER, Nathan; ROBERTS, Don D.; VAN EVRA, James (Eds.). Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1997a. p. 402-417.
ZEMAN, Jay. The tinctures and implicit quantification over worlds. In: FORSTER, Paul; BRUNNING, Jacqueline (Eds.). The rule of reason: The philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997b. p. 96-119. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442682276-008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






