Contributions of Peircean philosophy to contemporary debates on disinformation

Autores/as

  • Tarcísio de Sá Cardoso Universidade Federal da Bahia
  • Gustavo Rick Amaral Universidade Anhembi-Morumbi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2025v26i1:e69892

Palabras clave:

Belief, Disinformation, Peirce, Semiosis

Resumen

This text aims to theoretically explore how Peirce’s philosophy can serve as a basis for conceptualizing and explaining everyday practices understood as disinformation. We begin with a review of the Brazilian literature on the contributions of Peircean philosophy to the phenomenon of disinformation. We then situate our position as inspired by the normative theoretical proposal of Peircean semiotics. However, we argue that addressing disinformation events requires the addition of descriptive elements, which were not at the center of interest of Peircean philosophy. In light of this, we will examine two philosophical aspects that are important to a Peircean approach to disinformation: (1) the semiotic theory of information, seen as part of Peirce's normative account on the ideal development of semiosis; and (2) the fixation of beliefs, where we focus on the three non-scientific ways of settling a doubt and a belief. We argue that what is understood as disinformation in the current digital culture is a set of practices that, in general terms, deviate from the demands of systematic critical inquiry and function as deviations in the normal course of semiosis.

Citas

BAGGIO, R. H. Como as redes fixam crenças: uma análise realista da pós-verdade e suas implicações semiótico-pragmáticas. 2021. 200 f. Tese de doutorado – Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2021.

BERGMAN, M. C S Peirce on Interpretation and Collateral Experience. International Journal of Semiotics, v. 4, p. 134–161, 2010.

BERGMAN, M. Over Collateral Experience. p. 1–12, 2002.

DE TIENNE, A. Information in Formation. Cognitio: revista de filosofia, v. 6, n. 2, p. 149–165, 2005.

DE TIENNE, A. Peirce’s Logic of Information. Seminario del grupo de estudios peirceanos universidad de navarra, Navarra. v. 28, 2006.

FERRAZ, A. A. Peirce’s Concept of Information. VII Jornada «Peirce en Argentina», Buenos Aires, 2017.

HOUSER, N. The imperative for non-rational belief. Cognitio: revista de filosofia, v. 16, n. 2, p. 273–290, 2015.

IBRI, I. A. Semiótica e Pragmatismo: interfaces teóricas: vol. 2. São Paulo: FiloCzar, 2021.

KAISER, B. Targeted: My inside story of Cambridge Analytica and how Trump, Brexit and Facebook broke democracy. London: Harper Collins, 2019.

LISZKA, J. J. How Signs Convey Information: A Peircean Approach. Chinese Semiotic Studies, v. 12, n. 1, p. 45–66, 1 mar. 2016. Disponível em: <https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/css-2016-0005>. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2024.

NÖTH, W. Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Information: A Theory of the Growth of Symbols and of Knowledge. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, v. 19, n. 1–2, p. 99–123, 2012.

NÖTH, W.; AMARAL, G. R. A teoria da informação de Charles S. Peirce. TECCOGS: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, v. 0, n. 05, 2011. Disponível em: <https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teccogs/article/view/52894>. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2021.

PARISER, E. O filtro invisível: o que a internet está escondendo de você. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2012.

PEIRCE, C. S. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic ed. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1931. v. I-VIII (1931-1978). [CP]

PEIRCE, C. S. The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings. v. 1 e v. ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998. [EP]

PEIRCE, C. S. Ilustrações da lógica da ciência. Aparecida: Ideias & Letras, 2008.

RIBEIRO, D. M.; PAES, F. A. DE O. Verdade e crença sob a perspectiva do pragmatismo: contribuições para o debate sobre a desinformação científica. In: Alzamora, G.; Ribeiro, D.; Mendes, C. Sociedade da desinformação e infodemia. Belo Horizonte: Selo PPGCOM/UFMG, 2021.

ROMANINI, V.; RIPOLL, L.; OHLSON, M. Análise do conceito de desinformação a partir da semiótica de Peirce. Linguistic Frontiers, v. 5, n. 2, p. 61–68, 1 set. 2022. Disponível em: <https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/lf-2022-0009>. Acesso em: 25 maio 2024.

SANTAELLA, L. Definir desinformação é preciso. In: SANTAELLA, L. Flagelos da desinformação. São Paulo: Educ, 2023. p. 25–54.

SØRENSEN, B.; THELLEFSEN, M. M.; THELLEFSEN, T. Information as signs: A semiotic analysis of the information concept, determining its ontological and epistemological foundations. Journal of Documentation, v. 74, n. 2, p. 372–382, 1 jan. 2017. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2017-0078>. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-09-09

Cómo citar

Cardoso, T. de S., & Amaral, G. R. (2025). Contributions of Peircean philosophy to contemporary debates on disinformation. Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia, 26(1), e69892. https://doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2025v26i1:e69892