Linguistic analysis of Brazilian Portuguese through four continua:

Meeting the work of Marilda Cavalcanti

Authors

  • Stella Maris Bortoni-Ricardo Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x202259478

Keywords:

Povo brasileiro; trajetórias sociolinguísticas; metodologia de contínuos; alfabetização.

Abstract

My academic work meets with the work of Marilda Cavancanti (2018) when she deals with “rich insights into contemporary linguistic diversities in Brazil, into situated uses of different constellations of language resources, into local identity politics, into the histories of different linguistic minority groups and into ongoing changes specific to each group, e.g. rapidly developing transnational connectedness /…/ it builds a broad picture of the ways in which national language ideologies and language policies, and now globalized ideologies, have shaped the sociolinguistic trajectories of different groups” (Maher & Cavalcanti, 2018, p. 2). In particular, I will focus these trajectories discussing and revising a model that I developed of four continua: a) of urbanization, that spreads from the isolated rural vernaculars up to the urban variety of prestige; b) of literacy, that goes from oral events to events of literacy; c) of stylistic monitoring, which discusses footing with the hearer and d) of access to the Internet, related to digital literacy and to resources and gadgets that users own (Bortoni-Ricardo, 2021, p. 49). Illiterate or semiliterate voices echo throughout the work.

References

Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (1985). The urbanization of rural dialect speakers: A sociolinguistic study in Brazil. Cambridge University Press. Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (2011). Do campo para a cidade: estudo sociolinguístico de migração e redes sociais. Parábola Editorial. Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (2021). Português brasileiro, a língua que falamos. Editora Contexto.

Cavalcanti, M. do C., & Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (Eds.). (2007).

Transculturalidade, linguagem e educação. Mercado de Letras. Cavalcanti, M. do C., & Maher, T. J. M. (Eds.). (2018). Multilingual Brazil: Language Resources, Identities and Ideologies in a Globalized World. Routledge.

Giles, H., & Smith, P. M. (1979). Accommodation Theory: optimal levels

of convergence. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social

psychology (pp. 45-65). Basil Blackwell.

Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech style and perceived status:

some conceptual distinctions. In H. Giles & P. Powesland (Eds.),

Speech style and social evaluation (pp. 9-22). Academic Press. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press. Labov, W. (1966). The effect of social mobility on linguistic behavior. Social Inquiry, vol. 36, 186-203.

Le Page, R. B. (1980). Projection, focusing and diffusion. York Paper in Linguistics, 9, 9-31.

Rodrigues, A. (1986). Línguas brasileiras: Para o conhecimento das línguas indígenas. Loyola.

Scherre, M. M. (1978). A regra de concordância nominal de número no sintagma nominal em português. [Dissertação de mestrado]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.

Spanevello, R. M., Moreira, S. L., & Boscardin, M. (2019). Dinâmica demográfica da população rural: o caso do COREDE alto Jacuí, Rio Grande do Sul. Nucleus, 16(1), 69-84.

Vieira Jr., I. (2019). Torto Arado. Todavia.

Wolfram, W., & Fasold, R. W. (1974). The Study of Social Dialects in

American English. Prentice-Hall.

Published

2023-09-09

How to Cite

Bortoni-Ricardo, S. M. (2023). Linguistic analysis of Brazilian Portuguese through four continua:: Meeting the work of Marilda Cavalcanti. DELTA: Documentação E Estudos Em Linguística Teórica E Aplicada, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x202259478