Urban Consortium Operations in Balneário Camboriú: the distortion of the principle of solo criado

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2021-5115

Keywords:

solo criado, urban consortium operations, master plans, City Statute, Balneário Camboriú/State of Santa Catarina

Abstract

Urban Consortium Operations (UCO) were popularized in Brazilian master plans after the enactment of the City Statute, mainly because of their promise of converging public and private interests in the implementation of large urban projects. This instrument is based on a principle known as solo criado: the separation between building rights and property rights, distributing the costs and benefits of urban development and regularizing the offer of incentives to the real estate market by demanding counterparts. Nevertheless, its results are polemical and have been little explored in smaller municipalities. The case of Balneário Camboriú (Southern Brazil), the object of this research, demonstrates the distortion of the solo criado principle by allowing the utilization of the construction potential generated by the UCOs outside the perimeter of the projects. Consolidating real estate expansion fronts, the instrument contributes to local high-rise building and has not generated many benefits to the city as a whole.

Author Biographies

Marina Toneli Siqueira, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Professora do Departamento de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Arquiteta e urbanista pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; mestre em arquitetura e urbanismo pela Universidade de São Paulo; doutora em planejamento urbano e políticas públicas pela University of Illinois at Chicago.

Carolina Silva e Lima Schleder, Pesquisadora independente.

Arquiteta e urbanista pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Published

2021-05-20

How to Cite

Toneli Siqueira, M., & Schleder, C. S. e L. (2021). Urban Consortium Operations in Balneário Camboriú: the distortion of the principle of solo criado. Cadernos Metrópole, 23(51), 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2021-5115

Issue

Section

Artigos Complementares