How Complex Is It To Understand Complexity?
A systematic study of complexity and decision making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2023v25i1.56458Keywords:
Decision-making, Complexity, Complex decision-makingAbstract
Humans face complexity in the most routine decisions, such as choosing the toppings of a pizza, and essential decisions in life, such as choosing the courses offered at graduate school and career decisions. This paper explores the interconnection between complexity and decision-making as scientific knowledge. The researchers used the technique of scientific mapping to achieve the research objective. The results show that research involving complexity and decision making are still necessary. The annual growth rate of scientific production related to these two topics is 12.12%. Career decision-making is a well-developed theme and essential in the research dynamics. Researchers can conduct more studies on the emerging theme of shared decision-making.
Metrics
References
Adami, C. (2002). What is complexity?. BioEssays, 24(12), 1085-1094. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10192
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bibliomerix. (2021). A brief introduction to bibliometrix [Web page]. Retrieved from https://www.bibliometrix.org/vignettes/Introduction_to_bibliometrix.html
Bossaerts, P., & Murawski, C. (2017). Computational complexity and human decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(12), 917-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.005
Caballero, J., Wolowich, W. R., Benavides, S., & Marino, J. (2014). Difficulty and discrimination indices of multiple‐choice examination items in a college of pharmacy therapeutics and pathophysiology course sequence. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 22(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12022
Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of management review, 13(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/258353
Carpenter, S. M., Yates, J. F., Preston, S. D., & Chen, L. (2016). Regulating emotions during difficult multiattribute decision making: The role of pre-decisional coherence shifting. PloS one, 11(3), e0150873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150873
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Crowder-Meyer, M., Gadarian, S. K., Trounstine, J., & Vue, K. (2020). A different kind of disadvantage: Candidate race, cognitive complexity, and voter choice. Political Behavior, 42(2), 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9505-1
de Bock, B. A., Willems, D. L., & Weinstein, H. C. (2018). Complexity perspectives on clinical decision making in an intensive care unit. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 24(1), 308-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12794
DeShazo, J. R., & Fermo, G. (2002). Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 44(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1199
Farashahi, S., Rowe, K., Aslami, Z., Gobbini, M. I., & Soltani, A. (2018). Influence of learning strategy on response time during complex value-based learning and choice. PloS one, 13(5), e0197263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197263
Franco, J. P., Yadav, N., Bossaerts, P., & Murawski, C. (2020). Structural properties of individual instances predict human effort and performance on an NP-Hard problem. bioRxiv, 405449.
Frosch, D. L., May, S. G., Rendle, K. A., Tietbohl, C., & Elwyn, G. (2012). Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult'among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health affairs, 31(5), 1030-1038. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0576
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of experimental child psychology, 88(2), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.002
Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Estabrooks, P. A., & Vogt, T. M. (2006). Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health education research, 21(5), 688-694. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl081
Garg, H., & Rani, D. (2019). Novel aggregation operators and ranking method for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to decision-making process. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09772-x
Hærem, T., Pentland, B. T., & Miller, K. D. (2015). Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Academy of management review, 40(3), 446-460. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0350
Holland, J., O'Sullivan, R., & Arnett, R. (2015). Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions. BMC Medical Education, 15, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0452-9
Iederan, O. C., Curşeu, P. L., & Vermeulen, P. (2009). Effective decision-making: The role of cognitive complexity in strategic decisions. Studia Psychologica, 51(4), 293-304.
Isham, E. A. (2020). Temporal experience modifies future thoughts: Manipulation of Libet's W influences difficulty assessment during a decision-making task. PloS one, 15(11), e0237680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237680
Landry, C., Garant, D., Duchesne, P., & Bernatchez, L. (2001). 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1473), 1279-1285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1659
Liao, H., Wu, X., Mi, X., & Herrera, F. (2020). An integrated method for cognitive complex multiple experts multiple criteria decision making based on ELECTRE III with weighted Borda rule. Omega, 93, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.03.010
Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.001
Moore, C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2014). "Just think about it"? Cognitive complexity and moral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.006
Omundsen, H. C., Franklin, R. L., Higson, V. L., Omundsen, M. S., & Rossaak, J. I. (2020). Perioperative shared decision-making in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand: Audit results from a complex decision pathway quality improvement initiative using a structured communication tool. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 48(6), 473-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X20960734
Perez, B., & Liberman, A. (2011). Toward the adoption of complexity science in health care: Implications for risk-taking and decision-making activities. The health care manager, 30(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182078be9
Pham, C. T., Gibb, C. L., Fitridge, R. A., Karnon, J., & Hoon, E. (2019). Supporting surgeons in patient-centred complex decision-making: a qualitative analysis of the impact of a perioperative physician clinic. BMJ open, 9(12), e033277. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033277
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
Ramchandran, K., Fiedorowicz, J., Chen, Z., Bu, Y., Bechara, A., & Andreasen, N. C. (2020). Patients on the psychosis spectrum employ an alternate brain network to engage in complex decision-making. PloS one, 15(9), e0238774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238774
Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity: A philosophical overview. Transaction Publishers.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, 69(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467-482.
Speier, C., Vessey, I., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer‐supported decision‐making performance. Decision sciences, 34(4), 771-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02292.x
Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Why humans are (sometimes) less rational than other animals: Cognitive complexity and the axioms of rational choice. Thinking & Reasoning, 19(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.713178
Swait, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2001). The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1086/321952
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard business review, 85(11), 68.
Shirey, M. R., Ebright, P. R., & McDaniel, A. M. (2013). Nurse manager cognitive decision‐making amidst stress and work complexity. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01380.x
Stadelmann, D., & Torgler, B. (2013). Bounded rationality and voting decisions over 160 years: Voter behavior and increasing complexity in decision-making. PloS one, 8(12), e84078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084078
Taib, F., & Yusoff, M. S. B. (2014). Difficulty index, discrimination index, sensitivity and specificity of long case and multiple choice questions to predict medical students' examination performance. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 9(2), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.12.002
Unal, O., & Maleki, E. (2018). Shot peening optimization with complex decision-making tool: Multi criteria decision-making. Measurement, 125, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.077
Van Ditzhuijzen, J., Brauer, M., Boeije, H., & van Nijnatten, C. H. (2019). Dimensions of decision difficulty in women's decision-making about abortion: A mixed methods longitudinal study. PloS one, 14(2), e0212611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212611
Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 37(1), 60-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0
Yager, R. R., & Abbasov, A. M. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(5), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21584
Zadeh, L. A. (1971). Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings. Information sciences, 3(2), 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(71)80005-1
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Administração em Diálogo - RAD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License after publication, allowing the sharing of work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase the and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
