Religion and epidemics in history: from essential to perverse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1677-1222.2020vol20i2a10Keywords:
Epidemics, Religion, Punishment, Suffering, CopingAbstract
This study addresses the relationship between religion and epidemics seeking recurrent postures throughout history. This study was stimulated by the question: What is the relationship between epidemic and religion? It is seen that ancient societies attributed both natural and religious causes to epidemics. The idea of epidemics as punishment is also recurrent in history. The groups indicated as guilty were the same ones that were already discriminated in that society before the epidemic. It is concluded that religion can play relevant roles in coping with the disease and encouraging solidarity. However, it can also play harmful roles, which leads to the worsening of the crisis. So, religious attitudes in epidemics oscillate from essential to perverse.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:- Authors retain copyright, but grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons BY-NC License.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), as long as with acknowledgment of authorship and first publication in this journal.