Adaptive management of innovative development of a higher education institution and readiness of teachers to implement an internal education quality assurance system

Authors

  • Kateryna Voitekh National Defence University of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4290-1766
  • Ruslana Romanyshyn Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University
  • Tetiana Dolishnia Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
  • Olena Vdovina National Defence University of Ukraine
  • Svitlana Genkal Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2026v17i2e74929

Keywords:

Quality of Education, Management of the Quality of Education, Intra-University Monitoring, Readiness of The Teacher, Innovative Functions of Pedagogical Activity, Professional Development, Educational Process

Abstract

The article examines the problem of ensuring and managing the quality of student education in the context of modernization of the higher education system. The relevance of the study is due to the increase in requirements for the effectiveness of the educational process and the need to develop effective mechanisms for intra-university monitoring of the quality of education. The paper specifies the scientific concept of the quality of education and the quality of training, reveals their essential and structural interrelationship in the context of the modern educational paradigm. A mechanism for managing the quality of student education at the university, including goal setting, planning, monitoring, analysis and correction of educational activities, has been determined. Special attention is paid to the professional readiness of the teacher as a key factor in the effective functioning of the system of internal monitoring of the quality of education. The structure of the teacher's readiness to carry out intra-university monitoring of the quality of education, taking into account the innovative functions of pedagogical activity, including motivational, cognitive, operational and reflective components, has been developed. The main means of intra-university monitoring of the quality of student education are defined and characterized. As a result of the study, a system of formation of teachers' readiness to carry out intra-university monitoring of the quality of students' education in the process of professional development was developed and experimentally tested. The obtained results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed system and the possibility of its use in the practice of quality management of education in educational institutions of higher education.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kateryna Voitekh, National Defence University of Ukraine

Senior Researcher, Center for Simulation Modeling

 

Ruslana Romanyshyn, Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Chair of the Department of Primary Education and Educational Innovations, Vasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University

 

References

ALEXANDER, B., ASHFORD-ROWE, K., BARAJAS-MURPH, N., DOBBIN, G., KNOTT, J., MCCORMACK, M., ... & WEBER, N. (2019). Horizon report 2019 higher education edition (pp. 3-41). EDU19.

BALZER, W. K. (2020). Lean higher education: Increasing the value and performance of university processes. Productivity Press.

BATAGAN, L., BOJA, C., & CRISTIAN, I. (2011). Intelligent educational systems, support for an education cluster. Proceedings of the 5th European Computing Conference, 468–473.

BRAY, M. (2007). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners (2nd ed.). UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

DESIATNYK, K., NOVAKIVSKA, L., PRYMA, V., KLOCHKO, L., & VDOVINA, O. (2022). Theoretical analysis of the problem of leadership in professional and management activities. Revista Eduweb, 16(4), 153-165.

GIOFFRE, M. (2017). Educational leadership and the challenge of inclusion: A study of primary school principals in Italy (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

IASECHKO, M., IASECHKO, S., & SMYRNOVA, I. (2021). Aspectos pedagógicos do autodesenvolvimento de alunos de educação a distância na Ucrânia. Laplage Em Revista, 7, 316-323.

IASECHKO, S., & IASECHKO, M. (2024). The role and impact of artificial intelligence in modern education: analysis of problems and prospects. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(00), e26. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v5i00.26.

LEIGHTON, R. H., & GRIFFIOEN, D. M. E. (2023). Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1207-1226.

LITTLEJOHN, A., HOOD, N., MILLIGAN, C., & MUSTAIN, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The internet and higher education, 29, 40-48.

LUNENBURG, F. C., & ORNSTEIN, A. C. (2012). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (6th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

PELLINI, A., & BREDENBERG, K. (2015). Education sector reform: The Cambodian experience. Development in Practice, 25(3), 488–502.

PORTER, M. E., & KETELHOHN, N. (2009). Competitiveness in Central America: The road to sustained growth and poverty reduction. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–67.

PRYKHODKINA, N., TYMOSHKO, A., SHOLOKH, O., MAKHYNIA, Т., KOROLIUK, S., & GENKAL, S. (2022). Peculiarities of Professional Training of Educational Managers in Conditions of Transformation Processes in the Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 2(13), 254-272.

PRYSIAZHNIUK, L., GENKAL, S., NADON, V., TOMCHENKO, M., FOMINA, I., & LYTVYN, A. (2022). Psychological and Pedagogical Features of the Organization of Collective Forms of Work in Different Age-Related Groups. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(1Sup1), 172-190.

R KUBRAK, S., VOITEKH, K., MELNYK, Y., FLERCHUK, V., & ANTONETS, V. (2023). The Current State And Prospects Of The Development Of Information Technologies In A Higher Education Institution. Synesis (ISSN 1984-6754), 15(3), 105-116.

SKVORTSOVA, S., & ROMANYSHYN, R. (2019). The Computational Activity of Younger Students: Neuropsychological Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 2817-2829.

SKVORTSOVA, S., SYMONENKO, T., BRITSKAN, T., ONOPRIIENKO, O., & ROMANYSHYN, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the professional activity of a university lecturer in Ukraine: Realities and prospects. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Artificial INtelligent Systems in Education co-located with 23rd International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2024). Bolzano, Italy, November 26, 2024 (No. 3879). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.

STEVENS, K. (2013). The development of virtual education: A global perspective. Educational Technology, 53(2), 32–36.

WOLFE, J., & W. ANDREWS (2014). The changing roles of higher education: Curator, evaluator, connector and analyst. On the Horizon, 22(3), 210-217.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2026): Journal on Innovation and Sustainability

Section

Papers

License

This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.

1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;

2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);

3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);

4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.