Urban resilience in action

a case study on the importance of a Risk Management Plan (RMP) in the public sector

Authors

  • Daniela Gasperin Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Arnoldo José de Hoyos Guevara Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
  • Adriane Parise Poder Legislativo do município de Veranópolis
  • Fabiane Parise Poder Executivo do município de Veranópolis
  • Giovane Machado Marques Prefeitura de Veranópolis
  • Priscila Spadari Prefeitura de Veranópolis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2024v15i3p66-77

Keywords:

Natural disasters, Risk Management Plan, Municipal public power

Abstract

Brazil recorded the highest number of natural disasters in 2023, with 1,161 disaster events recorded, 716 of which were associated with hydrological events, such as river overflows, and 445 of geological origin, such as landslides. On April 30, 2024, heavy rains hit the state of Rio Grande do Sul, causing the largest flood in history, of the 497 municipalities in the state, 461 were affected, 41 of which were states of public calamity and 277 in emergency situations. The city of Veranópolis began to face the situation. And in this work, it seeks to present the performance of the municipal public power of Veranópolis as a resilient and mitigating city in the risk management plan. We showed that the work carried out in the Risk Management Plan (PGR), carried out by various social actors, was crucial to minimize the impacts generated by the disaster. The reports show that the protocols were guidelines for the development of the practices carried out. The experience gave the opportunity to understand that urban resilience is not only a matter of immediate response, but also of medium and long-term preparation and planning; and that the Risk Management Plan plays a key role in this context.

References

Adapta Brasil. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Acesso em 05 jun. 2024.

Disponível em: https://adaptabrasil.mcti.gov.br

APM. Association for Project Management. Acesso em 05 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.apm.org.uk.

Bardin, Laurence. 2016. Content analysis. Editions 70. p. 279.

BRASIL. (2021). Ministério da Cidadania. Diretrizes para a atuação da política de assistência social em contextos de emergência socioassistencial. Brasília: Ministério da Cidadania.

CEMADEN. Centro Nacional de Monitoramento e Alerta de Desastres Naturais. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Acesso em 04 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/cemaden/pt-br

Defesa Civil do Rio Grande do Sul. (2024). Defesa Civil atualiza balanço das enchentes no RS. Acesso em 18 mai 2024. Disponível em https://defesacivil.rs.gov.br/defesa-civil-atualiza-balanco-das-enchentes-no-rs-18-5-12h

Drabek, Thomas. (2018). The human side of disaster. 2nd. CRC Press Publishing.

Durkheim, Emile. (2012). As regras do método sociólogo. Editora Edipro.

Folkman, Susan; Lazarus, Richard. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer Publishing.

Gil, Antônio Carlos. (2022). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Editora Atlas.

IBGE. Rio Grande do Sul: panorama. Acesso em 18 mai. 2024. Disponível em https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/rs/panorama

Keller, Edward; Devecchio, Duane; Clague, John. (2016). Natural hazards: Earths processes as hazards, disaster and catastrophes. Routledge Publishing.

Liu, Wenlin. (2020). Disaster communication ecology in multiethnic communities: understanding disaster coping and community resilience from a communication resource approach. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 15(3), 94-117.

Machado, Gustavo. 2024. Comissão de Inovação, Startups and Scale-ups da Board Academy. Disponível em: ttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/iassistente-de-gest%25C3%25A3o-desastres-nossa-primeira-para-o-gustavo-machado-33cjf

Madni, Azad; Boehm, Barry; Erwin, Daniel; Moghaddam, Mahta. (2022). Recent Trends and Advances in Model Based Systems Engineering. Springer Publishing. p. 1145.

Mata-Lima, Herlander; Alvino-Borba, Pinheiro; Mata-Lima, Abel; Almeida, José António. Impactos dos desastres naturais nos sistemas ambiental e socioeconômico: o que faz a diferença? Ambient. soc., 16 (3):45–64. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2013000300004.

Pangrazzi, Arnaldo. (2016). Cicatrizar las heridas de la vida. Editora San Pablo.

Quarantelli, Enrico Louis. (2015). What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question. London and New York Publishinf.

SDS do RGS. Monitoramento de abrigos: eventos adversos 2024. Acesso em 18 mai. 2024. Disponível em: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNThhYTZmMGMtZDhkNy00OTEyLTkzNmEtYjU1NWIyMTZmNTVjIiwidCI6IjE1ZGNkOTA5LThkYzAtNDBlOS1hMWU1LWNlY2IwNTNjZGQxYSJ9

Silva, Renato França da; Siqueira, André Machado de; Silveira, Teresa Côrtes da; Oliveira, Alexandre Barbosa de. A redução de risco de desastres, a agenda dos Objetivos Sustentáveis e os princípios do SUS, no contexto da pandemia de COVID-19. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 28 (06): 1777-1788. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023286.

Sorokin, Pitirim. (1942). Man and society in calamity: the effects of war, revolution, famine, pestilence upon human mind, behavior, social organization and cultural life. Transaction Publishers.

UN. (2024). United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Disaster. 2024. Acesso em 04 jun. 2024. Disponível em: http://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster.

UN. (2015a). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement

UN. (2015b). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 3 June 2015, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_69_283.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-11-27