RETENTION OF IDENTIFIED PROFESSIONALS AS POTENTIAL SUCCESSORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2021v12i2p57-66Palabras clave:
Succession, Successor, Retention, Succession process, Succession map, TalentResumen
The implementation of the succession process as a strategy of mapping, development and retention of talent is gaining space in organizations. This article aimed to verify whether organizations have a structured process for retaining professionals identified as potential successors and whether there is differentiation according to the level of maturity of the succession process. A sample of companies seeking to differentiate themselves in terms of people management, consisting of 396 companies, was analyzed. For analysis, the Phi coefficient was used, and the survey results showed that a small number of organizations have a process of retaining professionals identified as potential successors, and that organizations that are more mature with respect to their succession process are more likely to work on retaining their talents in a structured manner, and the aspects that lead to most voluntary dismissals of professionals in the organizations surveyed are linked to compensation, career and development actions.
Citas
BALLARO, J. M., POLK, L. Developing an Organization for Future Growth Using Succession Planning. [J] Organization Development Journal, 2017 v. 35, n. 4.
BOUDREAU, John W.; RAMSTAD, Peter M. Talent ship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, [J] The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 2005 v. 44, n. 2, p. 129-136.
CAPELLI, Peter. Talent management for the twenty-first century. [J] Harvard business review, 2008, v. 86, n. 3, p. 74.
COLLINGS, D. G.; MELLAHI, K. Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. [J] Human resource management review, 2009 v. 19, n. 4, p. 304-313.
CHARAN, R.; DROTTER, S.; e Noel, J. Pipeline de liderança: o desenvolvimento de líderes como diferencial competitivo. [B] Elsevier Brasil, 2009.
CHARAN, R. O líder criador de líderes. [B] Elsevier Brasil, 2008.
CRESWELL, J. W. Gestão de Carreiras na empresa contemporânea. [B] São Paulo: Ed. Atlas, 2010.
DUTRA, J. S.; DUTRA, T.A. Gestão do Processo Sucessório: Preservando o Negócio e a Estratégia. [B] São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.
DUTRA, T. A. O processo sucessório em empresas do setor de mineração: um estudo de caso. [M] trabalho de concussão de pós-graduação latus sensus, 2015.
_______. Gestão de Carreiras na empresa contemporânea. [B] São Paulo: Ed. Atlas, 2010.
FERREIRA, A. M. Processo sucessório em organizações brasileiras: um estudo com uso de ground theory. [M] trabalho de conclusão de pós-graduação da FEA-USP, 2015.
GALAGAN, P. (2010, February 14). Bridging the skills gap: New factors compound the growing skills shortage. [J] Association for Talent Development Journal, Feb.14, 2010.
GROVES, K .S. Succession management capabilities: planning for the inevitable transition of executive talent. [J] In Academy of Management Proceedings Vol. 2018, No. 1.
HAIR JR., J. F. et al. Análise Multivariada de Dados. [B] 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005b.
_______. Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. [B] 1. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005a.
HALL, D. T. Dilemmas in linking succession planning to individual executive learning. [J] Human Resource Management, 1986 v. 25, n. 2, p. 235–265.
____________ How Top Management and the Organization Itself Can Block Effective Executive Succession. [J] Human Resource Management, 1989 v. 28, n.1, p. 5-24, Spring89.
___________ Unplanned executive transitions and the dance of the subidentities. [J] Human Resource Management, 1995 v. 34, n. 1, p. 71-92.
HERNÁNDEZ-SAMPIERI, R.; FERNÁNDEZ-COLLADO, C.; BAPTISTA-LUCIO, P. Análisis de los datos cuantitativos. Metodología de la investigación. [B] Mc-Graw Hill Interamericana. México, DF, 2003.
HILLS, A. Succession planning–or smart talent management? [J] Industrial and Commercial Training, 2009 v. 41, n. 1, p. 3-8.
KUR, E.; BUNNING, R. Assuring corporate leadership for the future. [J] The Journal of Management Development, 2002 v. 21, n. 9/10, p. 761-780.
MANKINS, M.; STEELE, R. Turning Great Strategy into Great Performance [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2005.
MARCONI, M. de A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Metodologia qualitativa e quantitativa. [B] MA Marconi & EM Lakatos, Metodologia científica, p. 267-288, 2008.
OHTSUKI, H., C. Como as organizações brasileiras identificam pessoas aptas a assumir atribuições e responsabilidades no contexto do processo sucessório: um estudo de caso. [M] trabalho de conclusão de pós-graduação da FEA-USP, 2013.
PERDIGÃO, D. M.; HERLINGER, M.; WHITE, O. M. Teoria e Prática da Pesquisa Aplicada. [B] 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2011
PETER, J. The seven CEOS. The Essential Purpose of Succession Management. [M] Korn Ferry Institute, 2014.
ROTHWELL, W. J. Career Planning and Succession Management: developing your organization’s talent – for today and tomorrow. [B] Praeger, 2005.
________________ Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within. [B] 5th ed. AMACOM, 2015.
VELOSO, E. F. R.; PLOTHOW, C. B. D. A.; FREITAS, B. B. et. al. Processo sucessório: um desafio para gestores e pesquisadores [M]. Citado em: Atlas, E. Desafios da Gestão de Carreira. São Paulo, 2013, cap.3.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1.The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2.The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
