Uma análise bibliométrica de duas décadas de práticas de qualidade de gerentes e líderes de ensino superior na promoção da sabedoria prática e organizacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2024v15i4p124-142Palavras-chave:
Sabedoria organizacional, Sabedoria prática, Ensino superior, Gestão, Liderança, Análise bibliométrico, Mapeamento científicoResumo
A promoção da sabedoria tem lugar entre as práticas dos líderes do ensino superior? Se sim, qual a percentagem de documentos científicos produzidos ou publicados por instituições de ensino superior que analisam este tema? No mundo complicado de hoje, as instituições de ensino superior, devido ao seu conhecimento, desempenham papéis melhores e mais eficazes do que outras organizações na criação de um mundo civilizado e na resolução de problemas complicados e “perversos”. Nas instituições de ensino superior, alunos de diversas áreas aprendem diferentes conhecimentos e técnicas que parecem estar guardados em local fechado e dentro de diários e livros e não desempenham nenhum papel sensato na resolução dos problemas dos dias de hoje. Conseqüentemente, sabedoria e ser sábio no ensino superior tornam-se questões muito importantes. Assim, o presente artigo centra-se nas práticas dos líderes e gestores do ensino superior na promoção da sabedoria prática e organizacional. Para tanto, pesquisas relacionadas publicadas e perfiladas no SCOPUS de 2000 a 2021 foram analisadas por meio de pesquisa bibliométrica. Os resultados indicaram que, apesar da necessidade de promover a sabedoria e a acção sábia no ensino superior, a sua compreensão e implementação ainda está no início do caminho.
Referências
Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S. C., Harlev, A., & Henkel, R. (2016). Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal 0f Andrology, 18, 296–309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
Ale Ebrahim, S., Poshtan, J., Jamali, S. M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2020). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of Time- Series classification using deep learning. IEEEAccess, (Ml), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993538
Ardabili, F. S., & McKenna, B. (2020). Practical wisdom in Ancient Iran. In Practical Wisdom, Leadership and Culture (pp. 165-177). Routledge.
Ardelt, M. (2020). Can wisdom & psychosocial growth be learned in university courses? Journal of Moral Education, 49(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1471392
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-Tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Barnhardt, C. L., & Phillips, C. W. (2017). A developmental perspective on organizing for social responsibility: A fromwork of wise action for higher education organizations. Theory & Method Higher Education Research, 3, 77–97. https:// doi:10.1108/S2056-375220170000003005
Bierly III, P. E., Kessler, E. H., & Christensen, E. W. (2006). Organizational learning, knowledge & wisdom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(6), 595–618.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: detecting & visualizing emerging trends & transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of The American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Chen, Y., Jin, Q., Fang, Hui., Lei, Hui., Hu, J., & Wu, Y (2019). Analytic network process: Academic insights & perspetives analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.016
Cobo, M J; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, & cooperative study among tools. Journal of The American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Cornish, F. (2015). Evidence synthesis in international development : A critique of systematic reviews & a pragmatist alternative. Anthropology & Medicine, 22(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2015.1077199
Dala, Nikunj; & Pauleen, David J (2018). The Wisdom nexus: Guiding information system research, practice, & education. Information system Journal, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12196
Davis, J. (2016). The Greats on Leadership: Classic Wisdom for Modern Managers. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Dredge, Dianne; Benckendorff, P., Day, M., Gross, M. J., Walo, Maree., Weeks, P. (2012). The philosophic practitioner & curriculum Space. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(4), 2154–2176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.07.017
Eck, Nees John Van; & Waltman, Ludo (2009). Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer programfor biblimeetric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Gentile, Mary C. (2013). Giving Voice to Values: An Innovative Pedagogy for Values-driven Leadership Education. in M. J. Thompson & David Bevan (Eds.), Wise Management in Organizational Complexity (pp. 169–180). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hassi, Abderrahman. (2012). Islamic perspectives on training & professional development. Journal of Management Development, 31(10), 1035-1045.
Hays, J. M. (2004). Dynamics of organizational wisdom. Australian National University, 17–35.
Karam, C. M., Sidani, Y. M., & Showail, S. (2015). Teaching business ethics in the global south: Control, resistance, & phronesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(3), 255–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.1001833
Kessler, E. H. (2006). Organizational wisdom. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 296–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286883
Limas, Michael J; Hansson, R. O. (2004). Organizational wisdom. Aging & Human Development, 59(2), 85–103.
Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R., & Lester, P. B. (2006). Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305285335
Maxwell, N. (2017). Can universities save us from disaster? on The Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 25(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2016-0019
Monturo, Cheryl., & Hook, Kevin (2009). From Means to Ends: Artificial Nutrition & Hydration. Nurs Clin N Am, 44, 505-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2009.07.005
Mousavi Madani, Yaqub; Dadgar, A. (2020). Pathology of Iran’s higher education system from the point of view of Inflation of educational qualification(In Persian). Alzahra University. https://www.alzahra.ac.ir
Moradi, M., & Miralmasi, A. (2020). Pragmatic research method. Tehran: School of quantitative and qualitative research. Retrieved from. Available at: https://analysisacademy.com
Nixon, J. (2008). Towards the Virtuous University: The Moral Bases of Academic Practice. Routledge.
Page, Matthew J; McKenzie, Joanne; Bossuyt, Patrick M; Boutron, Isabelle; Hoffmann, Tammy C., Mulrow, Cynthia D., Shamseer, Larissa., Tetzlaff, Jennifer M., Akl,Eli a., Brennan, Sue E., Chou, Roger., Glanville, Julie., Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Hróbjartsson, Asbjorn., Lalu, Manoj M., Li, Tianjing., Loder, Elizabeth W., Mayo-Wilson, Evan., McDonald, Steve., McGuinness, Luke A., Stewart, Lesley A., Thomas, James .(2020). The PRISMA 2020 tatement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Research Methods & Reporting, 19.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Rooney, D. (2013). Empirical wisdom research: A community approach. in M. J. Thompson & David Bevan (Eds.), Wise Management in Organizational Complexity (pp. 34–52). Palgrave Macmillan.
Rousseau, D. M. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. Oxford University Press.
Salman Mahini, S. (2016). Delivery perspective in higher education: Knowledge - Based economy or Economy - Oriented knowledge? National Congress of Higher Education of Iran, 1–7(In Persian).
Sen, A. (2009). Capitalism beyond the crisis. New York Review of Books, 56(5), 1–7.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Thompson, M., & Bevan, D. (2013). Wise management in organisational complexity: An introduction. in M. J. Thompson & David Bevan (Eds.), Wise Management in Organizational Complexity (pp. 1–12). Palgrave Macmillan.
Waddington, H., White, H., Snilstveit, B., Garcia Hombrados, J., Vojtkova, M., Davies, P. (2012). How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: A tool kit. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711765
Walker, G. (2019). Higher education leadership & management as “‘practical reasonableness’”: A phronetic approache to higher education research. Theory & Method Higher Education Research, 5, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220190000005006
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
Wang, C., Lim, M. K., Zhao, L., Tseng, M., Chien, C., & Lev, B. (2019). The evolution of omega. The International Journal of Management Science Over The Past 40 Years: A Bibliometric Overview. Omega, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.08.005
Zupic, Ivan; & Cater, T. (2014). Bibliometric methods in management & rganization. Organizational Research Methods, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição - No comercial - Sin derivaciones 4.0 Internacional
1.O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
2.O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
3.A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
4.É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
1.1 Copyright Statement
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivers 4.0 International license.
1. The author (s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
2. The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of its author (s);
4. The editors are entitled to make textual adjustments and to adapt the articles to the standards of publication.
