Truth and its bias:

an empirical study about ideological bias and filter bubbles in São Paulo city in the 2018 elections

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-3585.2022i25p96-124

Keywords:

Communication, Fake news, Bubble filters, Echo chambers, Politics

Abstract

In the age of digital information, communication through social networks has boosted the circulation of news and information that are not always true. Inaccurate and distorted news has been used to pollute the public sphere and influence people. With this research, we seek to understand how much preexisting political ideology influences people’s ability to distinguish true news from fake news when exposed to them via social networks - in addition to discussing the complexity of the term Fake News. We also investigated the extent to which echo chambers and bubble filters impact the circulation of certain news within groups with different ideological profiles. In a field survey that interviewed 1,162 people in all regions of the city of São Paulo, demographic and political-ideological data were collected and crossed with the answers provided to define whether or not the interviewees believed in the news they were shown during the interview. Cartes presented by the research assistants contained four false or inaccurate political news (which had been denied by at least two data-checking agencies) and two true news. Respondents were asked if they had already seen that news and, when they responded positively, if they believed what was being said. The results showed that the political-ideological bias directly influences people’s belief about fake news. But, surprisingly, the data did not show a segregation of news between different ideological profiles. As a result, we were unable to prove the influence of bubble filters or echo chambers on the circulation of fake news in the city of São Paulo in 2018, and we will update this scenario for the discussion of the state of the art in 2022 – again, an election year.

Author Biographies

Ana Luiza Noblat de Aguiar

Ana Luiza Noblat de Aguiar é mestre em Filosofia no programa de pós-graduação em estudos culturais da USP, sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Pablo Ortellado. Pesquisa o uso de redes sociais para disseminação de informações falsas de cunho político. Também faz parte do Grupo de Pesquisa em Políticas Públicas e Acesso à Informação. Esta pesquisa for realizada com fundos da Ford Foundation. CV Lattes: lattes.cnpq.br/7390550863820851.

Bernardo Queiroz, Universidade Anhembi Morumbi

Bernardo Queiroz é Doutor em Comunicação em Semiótica pela PUC-SP (2017) e mestre em comunicação pela UFPE (2012). Pesquisa mudanças da cultura e estética em ambientes de rede. É Pesquisador-Membro do Grupo de Criação e Comunicação nas Mídias (CCM), e coordenador da grande área de Comunicação no campus Paulista da Universidade Anhembi Morumbi. CV Lattes: lattes.cnpq.br/8956816215942693.

References

ALLCOTT, Hunt; GENTZKOW, Matthew. Social media and fake news in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 31, n. 2, p. 211-36, 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 mar. 2019.

AGUIAR, Ana Luiza Noblat de. Verdade enviesada: um estudo sobre a influência do viés de confirmação e dos filtros-bolha na circulação de notícias políticas falsas na cidade de São Paulo. Dissertação de Mestrado. USP, 2020.

BAUM, Matthew; LAZER, David; MELE, Nico. Combating fake news: an agenda for research and action. Harvard Kennedy School, 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.

BENKLER, Yochai; FARIS, Robert; ROBERTS, Hal. Network propaganda: manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford: University Press, 2018.

BOWMAN, Shayne; WILLIS, Chris. We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. Reston: American Press Institute, 2003.

DAPP/FGV. Fraude nas urnas e ‘kit gay’ têm mais impacto que outras notícias falsas. 2018. Disponivel em: . Acesso em: Acesso em: 3 out. 2020.

IRETON, Cherilyn; POSETTI, Julie. Journalism, fake news & disinformation: Handbook for journalism education and training. Paris: Unesco Publishing, 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 29 ago. 2020.

LAZER, David M. J. et al. The science of fake news. Science, vol. 359, n. 6380, p. 1094-1096, 2018. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 17 maio 2018.

McKERNON, E. Fake news and the public: How the press combats rumor, the market rigger, and the propagandist. Harper’s Magazine, New York, vol. 151, p. 528–536, November 1925.

MURPHY, Gillian et al. False memories for fake news during Ireland’s abortion referendum. Psychological Science, vol. 30, 2019. Disponivel em: . Acesso em: 4 jun. 2021.

ORTELLADO, Pablo; RIBEIRO, Márcio Moreto. O que são e como lidar com as notícias falsas. Sur–Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, vol. 15, p. 71-83, 2018.

TANDOC JR., Edson C.; LIM, Zheng Wei; LING, Richard. Defining fake news a typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, vol. 6, n. 2, p. 137-153, 2017. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143>. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.

WARDLE, Claire. Fake news: It’s complicated. First Draft News, v. 16, 2017. Disponível em: <https://firstdraftnews.org/fake-news-complicated/>. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.

WARDLE, Claire; DERAKHSHAN, Hossein. Information disorder: toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe Report, DGI, vol. 9, 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 26 fev. 2019.

ZUBOFF, Shoshana. The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books, 2019.

Published

2022-12-26