Five senses, translated by Nelson Pimenta: reflections upon deaf poetry on YouTube

Authors

  • Carla Cristina Gaia dos Santos Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Vera Helena Gomes Wielewicki Universidade Estadual de Maringá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-4373.2017i19p146-162

Keywords:

Poesia Surda, Poesia no YouTube, Cinco Sentidos,

Abstract

Current communication technologies are great allies in disseminating and perpetuating Deaf communities literature and deconstructing geographic and social boundaries that earlier isolated them from each other. Since the advent of printing, writing has assumed the central role of transmission and construction of knowledge within various areas of expertise, and now the era of virtual communication has risen to remind us of other not so privileged forms of constructing meaning and communicating, which can happen in many ways. Throughout the internet Deaf people share their stories, poems, jokes and so on. Taking the studies of Lévy (2015), Kress (2003) and Lemke (2010) as reference, this article is aimed at reflecting upon the translation of Paul Scott’s Five Senses into Brazilian sign language by Nelson Pimenta, poetry on the YouTube.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Carla Cristina Gaia dos Santos, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Doutoranda no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras, área de Estudos Literários, linha de pesquisa Campo Literário e Formação de Leitores, da Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM – Maringá – PR – Brasil.

Vera Helena Gomes Wielewicki, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Doutora em Letras pela Universidade de São Paulo – USP; Professora/pesquisadora no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM – Maringá – PR – Brasil.

Published

2017-12-04

How to Cite

Santos, C. C. G. dos, & Wielewicki, V. H. G. (2017). Five senses, translated by Nelson Pimenta: reflections upon deaf poetry on YouTube. FronteiraZ. Journal of the Postgraduate Studies in Literature and Literary Criticism Program, (19), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-4373.2017i19p146-162

Issue

Section

Articles