“Falso empleo” y relaciones laborales en plataforma digital de transporte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2178-0080.2023v25i3.60703Palabras clave:
Uberización, Economía compartida, Plataforma digital, Análisis de contenido, Trabajo precarioResumen
Este artículo analizó la relación entre el contenido institucional y la práctica de las plataformas digitales de transporte en cuanto a las promesas y la realidad que se configuran en la relación comercial entre estas plataformas y los conductores registrados en ellas. De carácter cualitativo (análisis de contenido y entrevistas semiestructuradas; n=9), esta investigación tuvo dos pasos: primero, analizamos el contenido institucional exponiendo el posicionamiento de una de estas plataformas. En la segunda etapa, se realizaron entrevistas en profundidad a los conductores registrados en la plataforma analizada, buscando validar o no el contenido institucional de la plataforma. Las declaraciones de los entrevistados sugieren satisfacción con la remuneración que ofrece la plataforma. Por otro lado, hubo gran malestar en cuanto al trato, principalmente en cuanto a la seguridad y el proceso de evaluación de la plataforma. El falso empleo se evidencia en las declaraciones de los entrevistados, temerosos de perder el acceso a la plataforma como alternativa de subsistencia por las valoraciones negativas.
Métricas
Citas
An, J., Ngo, L. V., Chylinski, M., & Tran, Q. (2019). Customer advocates with a generous heart. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(2), 192–205.
Apouey, B.; Roulet, A.; Solal, I.; Stabile, M. (2020). Gig Workers during the COVID-19 Crisis in France: Financial Precarity and Mental Well-Being. Journal of Urban Health.
Bardin, L. (2015). Análise de Conteúdo (1 ed.). Edições 70.
Bauman, Z., & Penchel, M. (2021). Globalização: As consequências humanas (1 ed.). Zahar.
Bennett, N., Glatter, R., & Levačić, R. (1994). Improving educational management through research and consultancy (1 ed.). Paul Chapman Publishing.
Bieber, F.; Moggia, J. (2020). Risk Shifts in the Gig Economy: The Normative Case for an Insurance Scheme against the Effects of Precarious Work. The Journal of Political Philosophy. Volume 0, Number 0, 2020, pp. 1–24.
Borges-Andrade, J. E., & Pilati, R. (2001). Comprometimento atitudinal e comportamental: relações com suporte e imagem nas organizações. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 5(3), 85–106.
Borowiak, C. (2019). Poverty in Transit: Uber, Taxi Coops, and the Struggle over Philadelphia’s Transportation Economy. Antipode, 51(4), 1079–1100.
Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2010). The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education, Jobs, and Incomes (1 ed.). Oxford University Press.
Castells, M. (2013). A sociedade em rede (23 ed.). Paz & Terra.
Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (pp. 347–366). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Christie, N., & Ward, H. (2019). The health and safety risks for people who drive for work in the gig economy. Journal of Transport and Health, 13(November 2018), 115–127.
De', R., Pandey, N., & Pal, A. (2020). Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102171 - 102171.
DePillis, L. (2015, February 3). New tech companies say freelancing is the future of work. But there’s a downside for workers. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2015/02/03/new-tech-companies-say-freelancing-is-the-future-of-work-policy-needs-to-catch-up/
Dowbor, L. (2018). A Tecnologia Anda Solta: A Era Da Perplexidade. Blog Ecofalante. https://ecofalante.org.br/blog/a-tecnologia-anda-solta-a-era-da-perplexidade-por-ladislau-dowbor-tematica-consumo/
Drahokoupil, J., & Fabo, B. (2016). The platform economy and the disruption of the employment relationship. ETUI Research Paper-Policy Brief, 5, 1–6.
Drahokoupil, J., & Jepsen, M. (2017). The digital economy and its implications for labour. 1. The platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 103–107.
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2019). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal.
Faria, M. D. de, Carvalho, A. F. S. de, & Carvalho, J. L. F. (2012). O Consumidor em Ambientes de Varejo Online e Offline: Similitudes, Contrastes e Influências Recíprocas. IX Simpósio de Excelência Em Gestão e Tecnologia, 17. http://www.ww.w.aedb.br/seget/artigos12/21916169.pdf
Forde, C., Stuart, M., Joyce, S., Oliver, L., Valizade, D., Alberti, G., Hardy, K., Trappmann, V., Umney, C., & Carson, C. (2017). The Social Protection of Workers in the Platform Economy. In The Social Protection of Workers in the Platform Economy: Study for the EMPL Committee. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/614184/IPOL_STU%282017%29614184_EN.pdf
Freitas, M. E. de. (2006). Cultura organizacional: identidade, sedução e carisma? (5 ed.). FGV.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.
Friedman, L. T. (2017). Obrigado pelo atraso. Objetiva.
Friese, S. (2019). ATLAS.ti 8 Windows Guia Rápido. http://downloads.atlasti.com/docs/quicktour/QuickTour_a8_win_pt.pdf
Giddy, J. K. (2021). Uber and employment in the Global South: not-so-decent work. Tourism Geographies.
Howcroft, D. and Bergvall-K#areborn, B. (2019), “A typology of crowdwork platforms”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 21-38.
Huws, U. (2015). Online labour exchanges or “crowdsourcing”: Implications for occupational safety and health.
John, N. (2020). What is meant by “sharing” in the sharing economy? Built Environment, 46(1), 11–21.
Jorens, Y. (2008). Self-Employment and Bogus Self-Employment in the European Construction Industry. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1112697/file/1112792
Kovács, Ii. (2015). Trabalho, crise económica e social e propostas para a saída da crise. FIRST INTERNATIONAL MEETING OF ISSOW, November 2014, 25–40.
Lai, P. H., Chuang, S. T., Zhang, M. C., & Nepal, S. K. (2020). The non-profit sharing economy from a social exchange theory perspective: a case from World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(12), 1970–1987.
Li, Z., Hong, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). The Empowering and Competition Effects of the Platform-Based Sharing Economy on the Supply and Demand Sides of the Labor Market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(1), 140–165.
Mishra, S., & Bathini, D. R. (2020). Uber’s entrepreneurship discourse and its neoliberal appeal: analysis of coverage in English-language dailies in India. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(4), 394–411.
Montgomery, T., & Baglioni, S. (2020). Defining the gig economy: platform capitalism and the reinvention of precarious work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
Munaier, C. G. e S., & Las Casas, A. L. (2019). A Membership Program and a Complain Website: How Sport Clubs Manage Experiences of Their Members. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 10(3), 75–87.
Parigi, P., & State, B. (2014). Disenchanting the World: The Impact of Technology on Relationships. International Conference on Social Informatics, 29, 166–182.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (2014). Tratado da argumentação: A nova retórica (3 ed.). WMF Martins Fontes.
PwC. (2015). The Sharing Economy: Consumer Intelligence Series. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/technology/publications/assets/pwc-consumer-intelligence-series-the-sharing-economy.pdf
Quivy, R., & Campenhoudt, L. Van. (1998). Manual de Investigação em Ciências Sociais (2 ed.). Gradiva.
Ravenelle, A. J. (2017). Sharing economy workers: Selling, not sharing. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(2), 281–295.
Rifkin, J. (2000). A Era Do Acesso. Pearson.
Rifkin, J. (2004). O Fim dos Empregos também visualizaram Detalhes do produto (1 ed.). Mbooks.
Schor, J. (2016). Debating the Sharing Economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.22381/jsme4320161
Serrano, P. H. S. M., & Baldanza, R. F. (2017). Tecnologias disruptivas: o caso do Uber. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 11(5), 37.
Sharma, P. (2020). Digitalisation and precarious work practices in alternative economies: Work organisation and work relations in e-cab services. Economic and Industrial Democracy 1–26.
Siqueira, M. M., & Gomide Jr., S. (2004). Vínculos do indivíduo com o trabalho e com a organização. In J. C. Zanelli, J. E. Borges Andrade, & A. V. Bittencourt Bastos (Eds.), Psicologia, organizações e trabalho no Brasil (pp. 317–348). Artmed.
Standing, C., Holzweber, M., & Mattsson, J. (2016). Exploring emotional expressions in e-word-of-mouth from online communities. In Information Processing and Management (Vol. 52, Issue 5, pp. 721–732).
Uber. (2021). Website Uber. Ganhe Dinheiro Dirigindo Com a Uber. https://www.uber.com/a/join-new/
Vallas, S.; Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy? Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 46, 273-294. 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857.
Vasconcelos, I., Prestes Motta, F. C., & Pinochet, L. H. C. (2003). Tecnologia, Paradoxos Organizacionais e Gestão de Pessoas. RAE, 43(2), 94–106.
Vergara, S. C. (1998). Projetos e Relatórios de Pesquisa em Administração (2 ed.). Atlas.
Weiner, J. (2015, February 20). The hidden costs of being an Uber driver. The Washington Post, 1–3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/get-there/wp/2015/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-an-uber-driver/
Wood, A. L.; Graham, M.; Lehdonvirta, V.; Hjorth, I. (2019). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society. Vol. 33(1) 56–75.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish (2 ed.). The Guilford Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista Administração em Diálogo - RAD
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.