Virus semiosis: interview with Kalevi Kull

Authors

  • Winfried Nöth Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-9773
  • Kalevi Kull University of Tartu
  • Carlos Eduardo Pires de Camargo Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1984-3585.2020i22p13-20

Abstract

TECCOGS, Digital Journal of Cognitive Technologies, is pleased to welcome Professor Kalevi Kull, an eminent biosemioticist from the Department of Semiotics at the University of Tartu, Estonia, as a guest to comment on the topic “Virus Semiosis”. This theme seeks to answer whether viruses, such as the coronarivus Covid-19, spread through semiotic processes, that is, through semiosis.

The key to this question lies in the concept of semiosis introduced by Charles S. Peirce in his MS 318 of 1907, but implicit in all his early writings on the essence of signs and their processes. Peirce wrote, “By 'semiosis' I mean […] an action, or influence, which is, or involves, a cooperation between three subjects, being a sign, its object, and its interpretant” (Peirce 1907, p. 411). In other words, a semiosis process begins with a sign, which represents an object, and creates an interpretant, which exerts a semiotic influence with its specific semiotic effect. In this process, signs propagate through a semiotic agency with which they seek a semiotic purpose. The purpose of a symbol, at least, is to propagate, to multiply in the form of other symbols. A symbol that does not propagate dies due to obsolescence, lack of use and intelligibility. In this sense, the symbols seek final causes. They want to be understood. […].

Author Biographies

Winfried Nöth, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital (TIDD/PUC-SP).

Kalevi Kull, University of Tartu

Professor de Biosemiótica na Universidade de Tartu.

Carlos Eduardo Pires de Camargo, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

Doutor e Mestre em Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital (PUC-SP). Graduado em Engenharia Mecânica (FEI) e pós-graduado em Administração de Marketing (ESPM).

References

BAER, Eugen. Thomas A. Sebeok’s doctrine of signs. In: KRAMPEN, Martin et al., (eds.). Classics of Semiotics. New York, NY: Plenum, p. 181-210, 1987.

KULL, Kalevi. Vegetative, animal, and cultural semiosis: the semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics, n. 4, p. 8-27, 2009.

MORRIS, Charles W. Signs, language, and behavior. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall, 1946.

NÖTH, Winfried. O limiar semiótico de Umberto Eco. CooJornal – Revista Rio Total, seção: Opinião Acadêmica, Arquivo (1998). Disponível em: riototal.com.br/coojornal/academicos017.htm. Acesso em: 25 set. 2020.

PEIRCE, Charles S. Pragmatism (MS 318, 1907). In: Peirce, C.S. The Essential Peirce, vol. 2, Peirce Edition Project, (ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1998, p. 398-433.

PEIRCE, Charles S. 1931-58. Collected Papers, vols. 1-6. HARTSHORNE, Charles & WEISS, Paul, vols. 7-8, (ed.). Burks, Arthur W. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (CP, vol. & § no.).

SEBEOK, Thomas A. Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Lisse: Peter de

Ridder, 1976.

VILLARREAL, Luis P. Are viruses alive? Scientific American 2008, August 8. Disponível em: scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004. Acesso em: 25 set. 2020.

Published

2021-09-23

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>