Impacto da liderança na segurança psicológica em organizações: scoping review

Autores

  • Mônica de Oliveira Rocha Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
  • Edson Roberto de Paula Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-1123
  • João Carlos Caselli Messias Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6487-4407
  • Rodolfo Augusto Matteo Ambiel Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
  • João Massuda Junior Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/recape.v14i3.61013

Palavras-chave:

Liderança, Segurança psicológica, Revisão de literatura

Resumo

Este estudo teve como objetivo mapear evidências científicas disponíveis sobre o impacto da liderança na segurança psicológica no contexto de trabalho organizacional. Uma scoping review foi realizada seguindo as diretrizes do Joanna Briggs Institute. Foram consultadas as bases de dados Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO. O corpus final foi constituído por 17 artigos. Os resultados demonstraram o papel crucial da liderança na segurança psicológica das equipes, que emergiu ora como antecedente ora como mediadora de fenômenos como voz promotora ou proibitiva, compartilhamento ou ocultamento de conhecimento, criatividade e inovação, trabalho em equipe e aprendizagem com erros. 

Referências

Agarwal, U. A., Avey, J., & Wu, K. (2022). How and when abusive supervision influences knowledge hiding behavior: evidence from India. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2020-0789

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Binyamin, G., Friedman, A., & Carmeli, A. (2018). Reciprocal care in hierarchical exchange: Implications for psychological safety and innovative behaviors at work. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000129

Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654

Dansereau, F., Seitz, S. R., Chiu, C.-Y., Shaughnessy, B., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). What makes leadership, leadership? Using self-expansion theory to integrate traditional and contemporary approaches. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 798–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.008

Day, D. V. & Antonakis, J. (2012). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In J. Antonakis & D. V. Day (Eds.), The nature of leadership (2th ed., pp. 3–26). Sage Publications.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edmondson, A. C. (2020). A organização sem medo: criando segurança psicológica no local de trabalho para aprendizado, inovação e crescimento. Alta Books.

Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305

Fonseca, A. M. D. O., Porto, J. B., & Borges-Andrade, J. E. (2015). Liderança: Um Retrato da Produção Científica Brasileira. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 19(3), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2015140

Harvey, J.-F., Johnson, K. J., Roloff, K. S., & Edmondson, A. C. (2019). From orientation to behavior: The interplay between learning orientation, open-mindedness, and psychological safety in team learning. Human Relations, 72(11), 1726–1751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718817812

Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., & Wang, D. (2018). Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: How leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowermentiInfluence employees’ willingness to speak out. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287

Kim, B.-J., Kim, T.-H., & Jeon, S.-G. (2018). A Multilevel-Analysis on How Transformational Leadership Enhances Team Creativity: Sequential Mediating Effect of Employee’s Psychological Safety and CreativityNo Title. 4th International Conference on Lifelong Education and Leadership for All (ICLEL), Pp.688 - 703, 688–703.

Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear:The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.07.002

Knoll, M., & Redman, T. (2016). Does the presence of voice imply the absence of ailence? The necessity to consider employees’ affective attachment and job engagement. Human Resource Management, 55(5), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21744

Knoll, M., & van Dick, R. (2013). Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive voice, and the moderating effect of organizational identification. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.804113

Kumako, S. K., & Asumeng, M. A. (2013). Transformational leadership as a moderator of the relationship between psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams in Ghana. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v39i1.1036

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176

Liu, S., Hu, J., Li, Y., Wang, Z., & Lin, X. (2014). Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: Evidence from China. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.006

Lord, R. G., Day, D. V, Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000089.supp

Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2021). Sound and safe: The role of leader motivating language and follower self-leadership in feelings of psychological safety. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020051

McCall, M. W. (2010). Recasting leadership development. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01189.x

Men, C., Fong, P. S. W., Huo, W., Zhong, J., Jia, R., & Luo, J. (2020). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: A moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(3), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4027-7

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001

Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Soares, C., Khalil, H., & Parker, D. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020). The Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Londres, Joanna Briggs Institute. Disponível em https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2021). Does leader humor influence employee voice? The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of team humor. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211036464

Ramalho, M. C. K., & Porto, J. B. (2021). Validity evidence of the team psychological safety survey. Psico-USF, 26(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712021260114

Rego, A., Melo, A. I., Bluhm, D. J., e Cunha, M. P., & Júnior, D. R. (2021). Leader-expressed humility predicting team psychological safety: A personality dynamics lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(3), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04622-1

Rose, A. J., Carlson, W., & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1019

Schein, E. H., & Bennis, W. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods. New York: Wiley.

Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Wang, T. (2017). Charismatic leadership and tacit knowledge sharing in the context of enterprise systems learning: The mediating effect of psychological safety climate and intrinsic motivation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1221461

Smeets, L., Gijselaers, W. H., Meuwissen, R. H. G., & Grohnert, T. (2021). Beyond psychological safety – the role of direct supervisor behavior in fostering learning from errors at the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 14(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09272-6

Swain, J. E. (2018). Effects of leader humility on the performance of virtual groups. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21552

Tummers, L. G., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Leadership and job demands-resources Theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722080

Turano, L. M., & Cavazotte, F. (2016). Conhecimento científico sobre liderança: Uma análise bibliométrica do acervo do The Leadership Quarterly. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 20(4), 434–457. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2016140075

Wang, H., Chen, M., & Li, X. (2021). Moderating multiple mediation model of the impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666477

Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Humble leadership, psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and follower creativity: A cross-level investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01727

Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Li, X. (2019). Inclusive leadership and employees’ learning from errors: A moderated mediation model. Australian Journal of Management, 44(3), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896218805796

Zaman, U., & Abbasi, M. (2020). Linking transformational leadership and individual learning behavior: Role of psychological safety and uncertainty avoidance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 14(1), 167–201.

Zhu, J., Song, L. J., Zhu, L., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Visualizing the landscape and evolution of leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.003

Downloads

Publicado

2024-09-04

Edição

v. 14 n. 3 (2024): setembro/dezembro

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Carreiras e Pessoas

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista.
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s).
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es).
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.

• Os Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License, permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  2. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  3. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal), já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).