Recognizing the Dialogical Nature of the Landscape: For a Marxist Semiotics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573p55082Keywords:
Cultural geography, Dialogism, Speech genres, Chronotope, Historical materialismAbstract
This article aims to defend the dialogical nature of the landscape. Working in between the borders of the Bakhtinian philosophy of language and cultural studies on landscape, we defend that landscape study should not be studied without considering the cultural forms of communication in the different domains of social organization– the speech genres; that landscape is a semiotic encounter with a concrete otherness; that the interpreter who emerges when an area enters a relationship of representation is necessarily characterized as a chronotope; that every landscape is a chronotopic representation; that cultural geography recognizes that the semiotic aspects of the landscape are as material as its morphology. We start from the hypothesis that landscape is a chronotopic representation that is always made possible by means of some speech genre, because it is always a communicative process, and an encounter with another in a situation of socially organized interrelation – it is concrete dialogue. To find the deeper meaning of a landscape, one must recognize and understand its material, historical, geographical, and dialogic nature.
Downloads
Metrics
References
BAKHTIN, M. Os gêneros do discurso. In: BAKHTIN, M. Estética da criação verbal. Tradução de Paulo Bezerra. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2011, p.261-306.
BAKHTIN, M. The Dialogic Imagination. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
BAKHTIN, M. Os gêneros do discurso. Organização, tradução, posfácio e notas de Paulo Bezerra. Notas da edição russa por Serguei Botcharov. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.
BAKHTIN, M. Teoria do romance II: As formas do tempo e do cronotopo. Tradução, posfácio e notas de Paulo Bezerra. Organização da edição russa por Serguei Botcharov e Vadim Kójinov. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2018.
BAKHTIN, M. Fragmentos dos anos 1970-1971. In: BAKHTIN, M. Notas sobre literatura, cultura e ciências humanas. Tradução de Paulo Bezerra. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2017.
BEZERRA, P. Bakhtin: remate final. In: BAKHTIN, M. Notas sobre literatura, cultura e ciências humanas. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2017, p.81-96.
BOURDIEU, P. Le marche des biens symboliques. L’Atmee Sociologique troisieme seric, v. 22, p.49-126, 1971.
BRAIT, B. Olhar e ler: verbo-visualidade em perspectiva dialógica. Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso, São Paulo, v. 8, n. 2, p.43-66, 2013.
BRAIT, B.; CAMPOS, M. I. B. Da Rússia czarista à web. In: BRAIT, B. (org.). Bakhtin e o Círculo. São Paulo: Contexto, 2009, p.15-30.
BRAIT, B.; PISTORI, M. H. C. A produtividade do conceito de gênero em Bakhtin e o Círculo. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, São José do Rio Preto, v. 56, n. 2, p.371-401, 2012.
BUBNOVA, T. Los géneros discursivos en Mijaíl Bajtín. Discurso. Cuadernos de Teoría y Análisis, Cidade do México, v. 4, p.29-43, 1984.
CALCATINGE, A. The Need for a Cultural Landscape Theory: An Architect’s Approach. Berlim: LIT Verlag Münster, 2012.
CLAVAL, P. La geografía cultural. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1999.
CORRÊA, R. L. Carl Sauer e Denis Cosgrove: a Paisagem e o Passado. Espaço Aberto, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, p.37-46, 2014.
COSGROVE, D. E. Landscape as Cultural Product. In: SWAFFIELD, S. R. (ed.). Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1984, p.165-166.
COSGROVE, D. E. Towards a Radical Cultural Geography: Problems of Theory. Antipode, v. 15 n. 1, p.1-11, 1983.
COSGROVE, D. E. Em direção a uma geografia cultural radical: problemas da teoria. Espaço e cultura, Rio de Janeiro, v. 5, p.5-29, 1998.
COSGROVE, D. E. Landscape: Ecology and Semiosis. In: PALANG, H., FRY, G. (eds.). Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, p.15–20.
CRANG, M. Temporalised Space and Motion. In: MAY, J.; THRIFT, N. (org.), Timespace: Geographies of Temporality. London: Routledge, 2001, p.187-207.
DANIELS, S.; COSGROVE, D. The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
DELGADO, C. C. Pensar el paisaje. Explorando un concepto geográfico. Trayectorias, v. 7, n. 17, p.57-69, 2005.
DUNCAN, J. S. The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
FOLCH-SERRA, M. Place, Voice, Space: Mikhail Bakhtin’s Dialogical Landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, v. 8, n. 3, p.255-274, 1990.
GODELIER, M. Horizon, Trajets Marxistes en Anthropologic. Paris: Maspero, 1973.
GODELIER, M. La part ideelle du reel: essai sur l’ideologique. L’Homme, v. 18, p.155-188, 1978.
HOLLOWAY, J.; KNEALE, J. Mikhail Bakhtin: Dialogics of Space. In: CRANG, M.; THRIFT, N. (org.), Thinking space. Londres: Routledge, 2000, p.71-88.
INGOLD, T. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. New York: Routledge, 2000.
JONES III, J. P.; NATTER, W. Space ‘and’ Representation, In: BUTTIMER, A.; BRUNN, S. D.; WARDENGA, U. Text and Regional Image: Social Construction of Regional Knowledges, Leipzig: Selbstverlag des Instituts für Länderkunde, 1999, p.239-247.
LAGOPOULOS, A. P. Postmodernism, Geography, and the Social Semiotics of Space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, v. 11, n. 3, p.255-278, 1993.
LAGOPOULOS, B. P.; BOKLUND-LAGOPOULOU, K. Meaning and Geography: The Social Conception of the Region in Northern Greece. Berlim: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2015.
LAWSON, J. Chronotope, Story, and Historical Geography: Mikhail Bakhtin and the Space‐Time of Narratives. Antipode, v. 43, n. 2, p.384-412, 2011.
LINDSTRÖM, K.; KULL, K.; PALANG, H. Landscape Semiotics: Contribution to Culture Theory. In: LANG, V.; KULL, K. Estonian Approaches to Culture Theory. Approaches to Culture Theory 4. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2014, p.110-132.
LINDSTRÖM, K.; KULL, K.; PALANG, H. Semiotic Study of Landscapes: An Overview from Semiology to Ecosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies, v. 39. n. 2, p.12-36, 2011.
MEDVIÉDEV, P.O método formal nos estudos literários. Introdução crítica a uma poética sociológica. Tradução e notas de tradução de Sheila Grillo e Ekaterina Vólkova Américo. Apresentação de Beth Brait. Prefácio de Sheila Vieira de Camargo Grillo. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012.
MOORE, T. Emerging Memorial Landscapes of Labor Conflict in the Cotton Textile South. The Professional Geographer, v. 52, n. 4, p.684-696, 2000.
OSMAN, R.; MULÍČEK, O.; SEIDENGLANZ, D. Regional Heteroglossia: the Metropolitan Region as a Dialogical Landscape. European Planning Studies, v. 27, n. 11, p.2079-2098, 2019.
PEET, R. A Sign Taken for History: Daniel Shays’ Memorial. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Massachusetts, v. 86, n. 1, p.21-43, 1996.
ROSE, M. Landscape and Labyrinths. Geoforum, v. 33, n. 4, p.455-467, 2002.
SANTOS, M. A natureza do espaço: técnica e tempo, razão e emoção. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2006.
SAUER, C. O. A morfologia da paisagem. In: CORRÊA, R. L.; ROSENDAHL, Z. Geografia cultural: uma antologia. Rio de Janeiro: EdUERJ, 2012. p.181-217.
SPIRN, A. W. The Language of Landscape. Yale: University Press, 1998.
SOEIRO, Í. C. de M.; CARNEIRO, A. R. S.; RODRIGUES, S. G. C. A índole dialógica da paisagem: uma contribuição ao estudo geográfico de projetos urbanos em fase inicial. Caderno de Geografia, v. 30, n. 63, p.1074-1101, 2020.
VOLÓCHINOV, V. (Círculo de Bakhtin). Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem. Problemas fundamentais do método sociológico na ciência da linguagem. Tradução, notas e glossário de Sheila Grillo e Ekaterina V. Américo. Ensaio introdutório de Sheila Grillo. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso ISSN 2176-4573
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors grant the journal all copyrights relating to the work published. The concepts expressed in signed articles are absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.