The Discipline of Geography of Brazil in the College of Philosophy of Minas Gerais (1939-1953) and the Construction of National Ideology

Authors

  • Bruna Torres Batista UFMG
  • Doralice Barros Pereira UFMG
  • Rogata Soares Del Gaudio UFMG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/ls.v21i39.35877

Keywords:

Geography of Brazil, national ideology, College of Philosophy of Minas Gerais, territory.

Abstract

In Brazil the creation of Colleges of Philosophy during the first half of the 20th century marked a new moment in the institutional action of the discipline of geography, one that involved the universities and secondary schools. The promotion of science and the training of teachers does not exempt these activities from disinterested knowledge, but rather connects them to the construction of national ideology. That characteristic was observed in the analysis of documents related to the discipline of Geography of Brazil at the College of Philosophy of Minas Gerais. Its structure and content select elements of the national territory to construct a discourse forced on the modernization of the Brazilian state. Consequently, they are connected to ideology.

Author Biographies

Bruna Torres Batista, UFMG

Mestranda da Pós-graduação em Geografia da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil.

Doralice Barros Pereira, UFMG

Doutora em Geografia; professora Associada IV da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil. Autora, dentre outros, de La participation publique dans les unités de conservation au Brésil: Serra do Cipó.

Rogata Soares Del Gaudio, UFMG

Doutora em Educação; professora Associada II da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil. Organizadora de Geografias e ideologias – submeter e qualificar. Belo Horizonte: ed. da UFMG (2014).

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

Batista, B. T., Pereira, D. B., & Del Gaudio, R. S. (2017). The Discipline of Geography of Brazil in the College of Philosophy of Minas Gerais (1939-1953) and the Construction of National Ideology. Lutas Sociais, 21(39), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.23925/ls.v21i39.35877