Metaphors and parables in the Lotus Sutra
parallels with the Gospels and inspirations for interreligious dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2236-9937.2025.74153Keywords:
The Lotus Sutra, parables, metaphors, mashal, interreligious dialogueAbstract
Religious plurality is a fact that brings together several challenges, among them, finding a language that enables different traditions to become closer. Considering the dialogue between Christians and Buddhists, we can get some inspirations from their scriptures permeated by parables and metaphors, instead of having been considered as a set of dogmatic and doctrinal concepts. The article draws a comparative exercise between parables and metaphors of the Lotus Sutra and the Gospels. The subjects presented in those texts have parallels that can offer a way of approximation between these traditions. The metaphors presented have a strong appeal to perceive the meaning of life with the intention of escaping the dramas and dangers, and at the same time, present an openness to universal horizons. However, institutional and doctrinal interpretations can narrow these possible significations. Starting from analyses of the characteristics of this literature, we try to dialogue with some topics in Paul Ricoeur’s theoretical framework on his criticism of the Occidental thought that assumed conceptual accuracy instead of a lighter and more poetic expression with his intention to express the meaning of human life. Following his inspiration, we defend that the richness of parables and metaphors can touch human hearts more deeply than any conceptual theological formulations.
References
ANALAYO, Bhikkhu. Superiority Conceit in Buddhist Traditions: A Historical Perspective. New York: Wisdom Publications. 2021.
BEJA, Flora Botton. Reseña de “El Sutra del Loto de la Verdadera Doctrina”. Estudios de Asia y África. XXXVI: 2001. p. 569-574. Disponível em: <http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=58636313>. Acesso em: 18 nov. 25.
BUDDHIST DICTIONARY - Japanese English. Tokyo. Daito Shuppansha, 1999
CAMARGO, Marcos Ubirajara de Carvalho e (Trad.). O Sutra da Flor de Lótus da Lei Maravilhosa. São Paulo: Editorama. 2009.
CARNEIRO, Marcelo da Silva; FRIDMAN, Lucas Lima Martins. A Hermenêutica Rabínica do Mashal e sua influência no primeiro século EC. Estudos de Religião. v. 35, n. 3. set.-dez. 2021. p, 315-336.
CORNU, Philippe. Dictionnaire Encyclopédique du Bouddhisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. 2001.
COWARD, Harold. Sacred Word and Sacred Text. Scripture in World religions. Marynoll-New York: Orbis Books. 1988.
DICIONÁRIO HOUSSAIS DA LÍNGUA PORTUGUESA. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Objetiva. 2001.
MARGUERAT, Daniel. Le dieu des premiers chrétiens. Genève: Labor et Fides. 1990.
PEUZÉ, P.J.A.R. Mashal Rabínico ou Parabole? Parábolas dos Evangelhos à Luz dos trabalhos de Paul Ricoeur e Yonah Fraenkel. 115 f. Tese Doutoral (Doutorado em Letras) – Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo. 2018.
PEUZÉ, Pascal Jean André Roger. O Mashal rabínico (parábola rabínica): comparação ou metáfora? (2010). Vértices, 9, 150-156. Disponível em: <https://revistas.usp.br/vertices/article/view/179365>. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2025.
PYE, Michael. Preface to the second edition. Skilful means. A concept in Mahayama Buddhism. London-New York: Routledge. 2003.
RICOEUR, Paul. A hermenêutica bíblica. São Paulo: Ed. Loyola. 2006.
RICOEUR, Paul. A metáfora viva. São Paul: Loyola. 2005
ROKKEKYŌ - 「法華経」ワイド版 (上), [Sutra do Lótus - Versão expandida-volume 1. Texto japonês e chinês]. 岩波文庫..岩波書店. Iwatani Publisher: Tokyo. 2004
TOLA, Fernando; DRAGONETTI, Carmen. El Sutra del Loto de la Verdadera Doctrina. El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios de Asia y África: Asociación Latinoamericana de Estudios Budistas. El Colegio de México, Asociación Latinoamericana de Estudios Budistas, México D.F., 1999.1999. Disponível: <https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmc0924797>. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 TEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
TeoLiteraria – Journal of Literatures and Theologies owns the copyright of all published material. The whole reproduction of the articles of this Journal in other publications or for any other purpose, by any means, requires a written permission of the editor of this journal. Partial reproductions of articles (abstracts, more than 500 words text, tables, figures and other illustrations) must have a permission written by the publisher and the authors.