Neuroscience in Mathematics Teacher Education: A Literature Review of Theses and Dissertations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/2358-4122.74478Keywords:
Teacher Training, Mathematics Education, Mathematics Teaching, Cognitive NeuroscienceAbstract
This article investigates how Brazilian research has addressed cognitive neuroscience in the training of mathematics teachers, considering both initial and continuing education. It assumes that understanding the cognitive processes involved in learning, such as attention, memory, emotion, and reasoning, can offer relevant support for pedagogical practice in mathematics. Methodologically, the study is characterized as a qualitative literature review, carried out through the analysis of theses and dissertations available in the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD). Initially, 35 works that articulate neuroscience and Mathematics Education were cataloged, from which a more specific selection of 12 studies that explicitly address the training of mathematics teachers was chosen. The analysis of the works was guided by thematic categories defined a priori, allowing for an examination of the role attributed to neuroscience as a theoretical framework, its application in pedagogical practices and training actions, as well as the identification of gaps in teacher training. The results indicate that, in most of the analyzed research, neuroscience does not appear merely illustratively, but as a structuring theoretical foundation, influencing the methodological design, data analysis, and the development of pedagogical proposals. Furthermore, a significant investment in the practical applicability of neuroscientific concepts is observed, through didactic sequences, workshops, pedagogical interventions, and teacher training actions. Paradoxically, the studies also show that neuroscience, although consolidated in academic production, remains underrepresented in initial and continuing teacher training curricula, frequently being cited as an absent or insufficiently explored area of knowledge. This tension reveals the need for curricular revision and training policies that promote a more systematic integration between Mathematics Education and Cognitive Neuroscience. It is concluded that the field shows relevant advances but still demands research that deepens the articulation between theory and practice, especially regarding teacher training and the effective impacts of these approaches on the teaching and learning of mathematics.
References
ALVARENGA, K. B. (2021). Maneiras de avançar o pensamento matemático na educação básica com respaldo das neurociências. In: Faria, E. C.; Gonçalves Júnior, M. A. & Moraes, M. G. (org.). A educação matemática na escola: pesquisas e práticas goianas. Goiânia: Centro Integrado de Aprendizagem em Rede (CIAR). Disponível em: https://publica.ciar.ufg.br/ebooks/ebook_a_educacao_matematica_na_escola/05.html Acesso em: 29 nov. 2025.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2010.
BOALER, J. Mentalidades matemáticas: estimulando o potencial dos estudantes por meio da matemática criativa, das mensagens inspiradoras e do ensino inovador. Porto Alegre, RS: Penso Editora. 2025.
BOWEN, G. A. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, v. 9, n. 2, p. 27-40, 2009.
BROUSSEAU, G. Visite de L’Atelier “Théorie des Situations”. In: Actes de L’Université d’été (4-11 juillet). IREM de Clermont-Ferrand. 1998.
CAMPBELL, S. R. Embodied minds and dancing brains: New opportunities for research in mathematics education. In Theories of Mathematics Education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 309-331). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2009
COSENZA, R.; GUERRA, L. Neurociência e educação: como o cérebro aprende. Porto Alegre, RS. Artmed Editora. 2011.
CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de Pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Tradução L. O. Rocha. (2. ed.) Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed. 2007.
DEHAENE, S. É assim que aprendemos: porque o cérebro funciona melhor do que qualquer máquina (ainda...). São Paulo, SP: Editora Contexto. 2022.
GROSSI, M. G. R.; OLIVEIRA, E. S.; FONSECA, R. G. P. Currículo, neurociência e a formação de professores. e-Curriculum, São Paulo, v. 22, e59967, 2024. Disponível em <http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-38762024000100293&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. acessos em 04 dez. 2025.
KANDEL, E., SCHWARTZ, J., JESSELL, T., SIEGELBAUM, S., & HUDSPETH, A. J. Princípios de neurociências (5 ed.). AMGH Editora. 2014.
ZAIDAN, S., FERREIRA, A. C., PAULA, E. F. D., SANTANA, F. C. D. M., COURA, F. C. F., PEREIRA, P. S., & STORMOWSKI, V. A Licenciatura em Matemática no Brasil em 2019: análises dos projetos dos cursos que se adequaram à Resolução CNE/CP 02/2015. São Paulo, SP: Sociedade Brasileira de Educação Matemática. 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ensino da Matemática em Debate

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.


