Formulário de Avaliação por Pares

  1. Relevance and pertinence of the work to the research field*
    • Excellent
    • Very Good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Insufficient
  2. Conceptual rigor in problem statement*
    • Excellent
    • Very Good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Insufficient
  3. Consistency and rigor in theoretical-methodological approach and argumentation*
    • Excellent
    • Very Good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Insufficient
  4. Engagement with the existing literature in the field*
    • Excellent
    • Very Good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Insufficient
  5. Originality of the contribution to the field*
    • Excellent
    • Very Good
    • Good
    • Fair
    • Insufficient
  6. Uses references from the EMP (Educação Matemática Pesquisa) journal*
    • Yes
    • No

Comments for the report that will be read by BOTH the author and the editor: (Please detail the key points that led you to evaluate the aspects above positively or negatively. Use as much space as you deem necessary).

Comments for the report that will be read ONLY by the editor: (Please detail the key points that led you to evaluate the aspects above positively or negatively. Use as much space as you deem necessary).