Concepts philosophiques de l'insubordination créative dans la recherche en ethnomodélisation

Auteurs

  • Milton Rosa Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
  • Daniel Clark Orey UFOP

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2022v24i2p353-383

Mots-clés :

Insubordination créative, Ethnomodélisation, Approche globale, Approche glocale, Approche locale

Résumé

L'application des méthodes de modélisation est significative pour les chercheurs et les éducateurs lorsque ces professionnels examinent les modèles mathématiques développés par les membres de cultures distinctes. Actuellement, une question importante dans l'enseignement des mathématiques est sa tendance à valoriser une orientation locale dans son paradigme de recherche. Ainsi, la recherche de méthodologies innovantes telles que l'ethnomodélisation est nécessaire pour enregistrer les formes historiques des idées, procédures et pratiques mathématiques développées dans divers contextes culturels. Cependant, l'ethnomodélisation n'est pas une tentative de remplacer les mathématiques scolaires/académiques mondialisées, mais il est nécessaire de reconnaître l'existence de connaissances mathématiques locales dans le programme scolaire. Ce contexte a permis l'émergence de l'insubordination créative de l'ethnomodélisation en évoquant une perturbation qui a provoqué une révision des règles et règlements du processus de modélisation mathématique. Ce processus a déclenché un débat sur la nature des mathématiques par rapport à la culture en proposant un dialogue entre les approches locales et globales de manière dialogique. Ainsi, le principal objectif de cet article est de discuter de la philosophie de l'ethnomodélisation en tant qu'insubordination créative de l'enseignement des mathématiques et aussi en tant que processus de glocalisation.

Métriques

Chargements des métriques ...

Bibliographies de l'auteur

Milton Rosa, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto

Doutorado em Educação Matemática

Daniel Clark Orey, UFOP

Doutorado em Educação Matemática - Professor assoaciado II.

Références

Alvarez, M. A. A. (2005). Competencia intercultural, concepto, efectos e implicaciones en el ejercicio de la ciudadanía. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 35(5), 1-10.

Bennett, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: an integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In: Landis, D., Bennett, J., & Bennett, M. (Eds.). Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 147-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 119-128.

Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Bishop, A. J. (1990). Western mathematics: the secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2), 51-65.

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Canclini, N. G. (2011). Culturas híbridas: estratégias para entrar e sair da modernidade. São Paulo, SP: UNESP.

Cortes, D. P. O. (2017). Re-significando os conceitos de função: um estudo misto para entender as contribuições da abordagem dialógica da etnomodelagem. Dissertação de Mestrado Profissional em Educação Matemática. Departamento de Educação Matemática. Ouro Preto, MG: Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.

Cortes, D. P. O., & Orey, D. C. (2020). Connecting ethnomathematics and modelling: A mixed methods study to understand the dialogic approach of ethnomodelling. REVEMOP, 2(1), 1-25.

Crowson, R. L., & Morris, V. C. (1982). The principal’s role in organizational goal-attainment: discretionary management at the school site level. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 19-23). New York, NY: AERA, 1982.

D’Ambrosio, U. (1990). Etnomatemática: arte ou técnica de explicar e conhecer. São Paulo, SP: Editora Ática.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). The program ethnomathematics and the challenges of globalization. Circumscribere, 1, 74-82.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2015). Mathematical modelling as a strategy for building-up systems of knowledge in different cultural environments. In: Stillman, G. A., Blum, W., & Biembengut, M. S. (Eds.). Mathematical modelling in education research and practice: cultural, social, and cognitive influences (pp. 35-44). New York, NY: Springer, 2015.

D’Ambrosio, U., & D’Ambrosio, B. S. (2013). The role of ethnomathematics in curricular leadership in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4(1), 19-25.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.

Deardorff, D. K. (2009). The Sage handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O’Donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally situated designed tools: ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347-362.

Erbas, A.K., Kertil, M., Çetinkaya, B., Çakiroglu, E., Alacaci, C. &Bas, S. (2014). Mathematical modeling in mathematics education: basic concepts and approaches. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1621-1627.

Ernest, P. (2016). An overview of the philosophy of mathematics education. In: Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Roger, M., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (Eds.). The philosophy of mathematics education (pp. 3-8). ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Roger, M., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics education. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Giulianotti, R.; Robertson, (2007). R. Recovering the social: globalization, football and transnationalism. Global Networks, 7(2), p. 144–186.

Gudykunst, W. B. (1997). Cultural variability in communication. Communication Research, 24(4), 327-348.

Harris, M. (1980). The epistemology of cultural materialism. In: Harris, M. Cultural materialism: the struggle for a science of culture (pp. 29-45). New York, NY: Random House.

Headland, T. N.; Pike, K. L., & Marvin Harris (1990). Emics and etics: the insider/outsider debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequence: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hutchinson S. A. (1990). Responsible subversion: a study of rule-bending among nurses. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 4(1), 3-17.

Iser, W. On translatability. Surfaces, 4, 5-13, 1994.

Khondker, H. H. (2004). Glocalization as globalization: evolution of a sociological concept. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 1(2), 12–20.

Kubokawa, A., & Ottaway, A. (2009). Positive psychology and cultural sensitivity: a review of the literature. Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1(2), 130-138.

Laenui, P. (2000). Processes of decolonization. In: Battiste, M. (Ed.). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 150-160) Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.

Leung, F. K. S., Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., & Wong, K. L. (2021). Mathematical modelling education in the cultural contexts of west and east. In: Leung, F. K. S., Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., & Wong, K. L. (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education in east and west (pp. 3-16). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Lyman, L. L., Ashby, D. E., & Tripses, J. S. (2005). Leaders who dare: pushing the boundaries. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education,.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: from research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Maynard, M. L. (2005). From global to local: how Gillette’s sensor Excel accommodates to Japan. Keio Communication Review, 25(3), 57-75.

Mendis, P. (2007). Glocalization: the human side of globalization as if the Washington consensus mattered. Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press.

Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. (1978). Anthropological research: the structure of inquiry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

Pradhan, J. B. (2017). Mathematical ideas in Chundara culture: unfolding a Nepalese teaching and learning system. In: Rosa, M., Shirley, L., Gavarrete, M. E., & Alangui, W. V. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for mathematics education (pp. 125-152). ICME-13 Monographs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In: Featherstone, M. (Ed.). Global modernities (pp. 25-44). London, England: Sage.

Robins K. (1991). Tradition and translation: national culture in its global context. In: Corner J.. & Harvey S. Enterprise and heritage: crosscurrents of national culture (pp. 21-45). Londres, England: Routledge.

Rosa, M. (2010). A mixed method study to understand the perceptions of high school leaders about English language learners (ELL): the case of mathematics. College of Education. Doctorate Dissertation in Education. Sacramento, CA: California State University

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C (2010). Ethnomodelling: an ethnomathematical holistic tool. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 14(3), 191-195.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2012). O campo de pesquisa em etnomodelagem: as abordagens êmica, ética e dialética. Educação e Pesquisa, 38(4), 865-879.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2013). Ethnomodelling as a research lens on ethnomathematics and modelling. In Stillman, G. A., & Brown, J. (Orgs.). Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice (pp. 117-127). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015a). Evidence of creative insubordination in the research of pedagogical action of ethnomathematics program. In: D’Ambrosio, B. S., & Lopes, C. E. (Orgs.). Creative insubordination in Brazilian mathematics education research (pp. 131-146). Raleigh, NC: Lulu Press.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015b). Three approaches in the research field of ethnomodelling: emic (local), etic (global), and dialogic (glocal). Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 8(2), 364-380.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2017). Etnomodelagem: a arte de traduzir práticas matemáticas locais. São Paulo, SP: Editora Livraria da Física.

Rosa, M., Orey, D. C. (2019). Ethnomathematics and the responsible subversion of its pedagogical action: an investigation based on three anthropological approaches. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos – RBEP, 100(254), 191-209.

Séguinot, C. (1995). Translation and advertising: going global. In: Shäffner, C., & Holmes, K. (Eds.). Cultural functions of translation (pp. 55-69) Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.

Skovsmose, O. (2016). Critical mathematics education: concerns, notions, and future. In: Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Roger, M., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (Eds.). The philosophy of mathematics education (pp. 9-13). ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Sue, D. W.; Sue, D. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: theory and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Walker L. O. (2005). Avant KC strategies for theory construction in nursing. Boston, MA: Boston Prentice Hall.

Wexler, J. (2004). Alterity: theories of media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

Unesco (2009). Organização das Nações Unidas para a educação, a ciência e a cultura. Investir na diversidade cultural e no diálogo intercultural: direito humano à educação. Brasília, DF: Unesco.

Yifeng, S. (2009). Cultural translation in the context of glocalization. Ariel, 40(2-3), 89–110.

Zeitlin, M., Ghassemi, H.. & Mansur, M. (1990). Positive deviance in child nutrition: with emphasis on psychological and behavioural aspects and implications for development. Tokyo, Japan: The United Nations University.

Zhu, Y., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2013). Balancing emic and etic: situated learning and ethnography of communication in cross-cultural management education. Academic of Managing Learning and Education, 12(3), 380-395.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2022-08-31

Comment citer

ROSA, M.; OREY, D. C. Concepts philosophiques de l’insubordination créative dans la recherche en ethnomodélisation. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 24, n. 2, p. 353–383, 2022. DOI: 10.23925/1983-3156.2022v24i2p353-383. Disponível em: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/emp/article/view/57289. Acesso em: 17 juill. 2024.

Numéro

Rubrique

Numéro Espécial: Philosophie de l'éducation mathématique 2022