Conceitos filosóficos de insubordinação criativa na pesquisa de etnomodelagem

Autores

  • Milton Rosa Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
  • Daniel Clark Orey UFOP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2022v24i2p353-383

Palavras-chave:

Insubordinação Criativa, Etnomodelagem, Abordagem Global, Abordagem Local, Abordagem Glocal

Resumo

A aplicação de métodos de modelagem tem sentido para os pesquisadores e educadores quando esses profissionais examinam os padrões matemáticos desenvolvidos pelos membros de culturas distintas. Atualmente, uma questão importante na educação matemática é a sua tendência em valorizar uma orientação local em seu paradigma de pesquisa. Assim, é necessária uma busca por metodologias inovadoras, como a etnomodelagem, para registrar as formas históricas das ideias, procedimentos e práticas matemáticas desenvolvidas em diversos contextos culturais. No entanto, a etnomodelagem não é uma tentativa de substituir a matemática escolar/acadêmica globalizada, porém, é necessário reconhecer a existência do conhecimento matemático local no currículo escolar. Esse contexto possibilitou o surgimento da insubordinação criativa da etnomodelagem ao evocar uma perturbação que provocou uma revisão das regras e regulamentos no processo de modelagem matemática. Esse processo desencadeou um debate sobre a natureza da matemática em relação à cultura ao propor um diálogo entre as abordagens locais e globais de maneiras dialógicas. Assim, o principal objetivo deste artigo é discutir a filosofia da etnomodelagem como uma insubordinação criativa da educação matemática e como um processo de glocalização.

Metrics

Carregando Métricas ...

Biografia do Autor

Milton Rosa, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto

Professor Adjunto I do CEAD na UFOP

Daniel Clark Orey, UFOP

Doutorado em Educação Matemática - Professor assoaciado II.

Referências

Alvarez, M. A. A. (2005). Competencia intercultural, concepto, efectos e implicaciones en el ejercicio de la ciudadanía. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 35(5), 1-10.

Bennett, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Developing intercultural sensitivity: an integrative approach to global and domestic diversity. In: Landis, D., Bennett, J., & Bennett, M. (Eds.). Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 147-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4(2), 119-128.

Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: a cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Bishop, A. J. (1990). Western mathematics: the secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2), 51-65.

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Canclini, N. G. (2011). Culturas híbridas: estratégias para entrar e sair da modernidade. São Paulo, SP: UNESP.

Cortes, D. P. O. (2017). Re-significando os conceitos de função: um estudo misto para entender as contribuições da abordagem dialógica da etnomodelagem. Dissertação de Mestrado Profissional em Educação Matemática. Departamento de Educação Matemática. Ouro Preto, MG: Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.

Cortes, D. P. O., & Orey, D. C. (2020). Connecting ethnomathematics and modelling: A mixed methods study to understand the dialogic approach of ethnomodelling. REVEMOP, 2(1), 1-25.

Crowson, R. L., & Morris, V. C. (1982). The principal’s role in organizational goal-attainment: discretionary management at the school site level. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 19-23). New York, NY: AERA, 1982.

D’Ambrosio, U. (1990). Etnomatemática: arte ou técnica de explicar e conhecer. São Paulo, SP: Editora Ática.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). The program ethnomathematics and the challenges of globalization. Circumscribere, 1, 74-82.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2015). Mathematical modelling as a strategy for building-up systems of knowledge in different cultural environments. In: Stillman, G. A., Blum, W., & Biembengut, M. S. (Eds.). Mathematical modelling in education research and practice: cultural, social, and cognitive influences (pp. 35-44). New York, NY: Springer, 2015.

D’Ambrosio, U., & D’Ambrosio, B. S. (2013). The role of ethnomathematics in curricular leadership in mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4(1), 19-25.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.

Deardorff, D. K. (2009). The Sage handbook of intercultural competence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O’Donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally situated designed tools: ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347-362.

Erbas, A.K., Kertil, M., Çetinkaya, B., Çakiroglu, E., Alacaci, C. &Bas, S. (2014). Mathematical modeling in mathematics education: basic concepts and approaches. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1621-1627.

Ernest, P. (2016). An overview of the philosophy of mathematics education. In: Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Roger, M., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (Eds.). The philosophy of mathematics education (pp. 3-8). ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Roger, M., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics education. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Giulianotti, R.; Robertson, (2007). R. Recovering the social: globalization, football and transnationalism. Global Networks, 7(2), p. 144–186.

Gudykunst, W. B. (1997). Cultural variability in communication. Communication Research, 24(4), 327-348.

Harris, M. (1980). The epistemology of cultural materialism. In: Harris, M. Cultural materialism: the struggle for a science of culture (pp. 29-45). New York, NY: Random House.

Headland, T. N.; Pike, K. L., & Marvin Harris (1990). Emics and etics: the insider/outsider debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequence: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hutchinson S. A. (1990). Responsible subversion: a study of rule-bending among nurses. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 4(1), 3-17.

Iser, W. On translatability. Surfaces, 4, 5-13, 1994.

Khondker, H. H. (2004). Glocalization as globalization: evolution of a sociological concept. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 1(2), 12–20.

Kubokawa, A., & Ottaway, A. (2009). Positive psychology and cultural sensitivity: a review of the literature. Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1(2), 130-138.

Laenui, P. (2000). Processes of decolonization. In: Battiste, M. (Ed.). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 150-160) Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.

Leung, F. K. S., Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., & Wong, K. L. (2021). Mathematical modelling education in the cultural contexts of west and east. In: Leung, F. K. S., Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., & Wong, K. L. (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education in east and west (pp. 3-16). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Lyman, L. L., Ashby, D. E., & Tripses, J. S. (2005). Leaders who dare: pushing the boundaries. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education,.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: from research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Maynard, M. L. (2005). From global to local: how Gillette’s sensor Excel accommodates to Japan. Keio Communication Review, 25(3), 57-75.

Mendis, P. (2007). Glocalization: the human side of globalization as if the Washington consensus mattered. Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press.

Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. (1978). Anthropological research: the structure of inquiry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

Pradhan, J. B. (2017). Mathematical ideas in Chundara culture: unfolding a Nepalese teaching and learning system. In: Rosa, M., Shirley, L., Gavarrete, M. E., & Alangui, W. V. (Eds.), Ethnomathematics and its diverse approaches for mathematics education (pp. 125-152). ICME-13 Monographs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In: Featherstone, M. (Ed.). Global modernities (pp. 25-44). London, England: Sage.

Robins K. (1991). Tradition and translation: national culture in its global context. In: Corner J.. & Harvey S. Enterprise and heritage: crosscurrents of national culture (pp. 21-45). Londres, England: Routledge.

Rosa, M. (2010). A mixed method study to understand the perceptions of high school leaders about English language learners (ELL): the case of mathematics. College of Education. Doctorate Dissertation in Education. Sacramento, CA: California State University

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C (2010). Ethnomodelling: an ethnomathematical holistic tool. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 14(3), 191-195.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2012). O campo de pesquisa em etnomodelagem: as abordagens êmica, ética e dialética. Educação e Pesquisa, 38(4), 865-879.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2013). Ethnomodelling as a research lens on ethnomathematics and modelling. In Stillman, G. A., & Brown, J. (Orgs.). Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice (pp. 117-127). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015a). Evidence of creative insubordination in the research of pedagogical action of ethnomathematics program. In: D’Ambrosio, B. S., & Lopes, C. E. (Orgs.). Creative insubordination in Brazilian mathematics education research (pp. 131-146). Raleigh, NC: Lulu Press.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015b). Three approaches in the research field of ethnomodelling: emic (local), etic (global), and dialogic (glocal). Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 8(2), 364-380.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2017). Etnomodelagem: a arte de traduzir práticas matemáticas locais. São Paulo, SP: Editora Livraria da Física.

Rosa, M., Orey, D. C. (2019). Ethnomathematics and the responsible subversion of its pedagogical action: an investigation based on three anthropological approaches. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos – RBEP, 100(254), 191-209.

Séguinot, C. (1995). Translation and advertising: going global. In: Shäffner, C., & Holmes, K. (Eds.). Cultural functions of translation (pp. 55-69) Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.

Skovsmose, O. (2016). Critical mathematics education: concerns, notions, and future. In: Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Roger, M., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (Eds.). The philosophy of mathematics education (pp. 9-13). ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen.

Sue, D. W.; Sue, D. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: theory and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Walker L. O. (2005). Avant KC strategies for theory construction in nursing. Boston, MA: Boston Prentice Hall.

Wexler, J. (2004). Alterity: theories of media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

Unesco (2009). Organização das Nações Unidas para a educação, a ciência e a cultura. Investir na diversidade cultural e no diálogo intercultural: direito humano à educação. Brasília, DF: Unesco.

Yifeng, S. (2009). Cultural translation in the context of glocalization. Ariel, 40(2-3), 89–110.

Zeitlin, M., Ghassemi, H.. & Mansur, M. (1990). Positive deviance in child nutrition: with emphasis on psychological and behavioural aspects and implications for development. Tokyo, Japan: The United Nations University.

Zhu, Y., & Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2013). Balancing emic and etic: situated learning and ethnography of communication in cross-cultural management education. Academic of Managing Learning and Education, 12(3), 380-395.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-08-31

Edição

Seção

Finalizada - Número especial: Filosofia da Educação Matemática –2022