A study of students’ proving processes at the junior high- school level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2022v24i1p698-721Keywords:
Proof process, Types of proofs, Students' beliefs about proof in mathematicsAbstract
The aim of this research is to identify the foundations of students' belief in the validity of an assertion in their mathematical activity: what they recognize in practice as a proof and how they treat a refutation. We focused this study on the relationships between students' proving processes, the knowledge they have, the language they can use, and the role of the situational context. The types of proof processes evidenced by the students do not intrinsically characterize what we might call their "rationality", in that different levels of proof could be observed in their problem-solving activity. The meaning of the proof processes cannot be understood without a careful analysis of the students' conceptions of the mathematical concepts involved and their reading of the situation in which they act. The characteristics of the situation seem to determine the level of proof, while the students' image of mathematics also plays an important role, especially in dealing with refutations. It is observed that the passage from pragmatic to intellectual proofs requires a cognitive and linguistic foundation. Disregarding the complexity of this passage may be one of the main reasons for the failure of teaching mathematical proof, since this passage is often considered only at the logical level. In geometry in particular, this teaching occurs in a conceptual field that, for students has not yet constituted itself as a theory; since geometry was for them essentially restricted to the observation and construction of geometric objects with no need for proof. Thus, the teaching of proof is associated with what could be described as a cognitive break in student activity, related to the didactic break represented by the new requirement for mathematical proofs.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Balacheff N., 1982, Preuve et démonstration en mathématiques au Collège. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 33, pp.261‐304
Balacheff N., 1987a, Processus de preuve et situations de validation. Educational studies in mathematics, 8 pp.147‐176
Balacheff N., 1987b, Cognitive versus situationa1 analysis of problem-solving behaviors. For the learning of mathematics, 63, pp.10-12
Balacheff N., 1988, Une étude des processus de preuve en mathématiques chez des élèves de Collège. Thèse d'état, Université Joseph Fourier, Genoble1
Bourdieu P., 1980, Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit
Fishbein E., 1982, Intuition and Proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32, pp. 9‐18 et 24
Galbraith P.L., 1979, Pupils proving. Shell Centre for Mathematical Education. The University of Nottingham
Hanna G., 1983, Rigorous Proofs in Mathematics Education. Curriculum series 48. The Ontario Institute for studies in Education
Lakatos I., 1976, Proofs and refutations. Cambridge University Press Piaget J., 1974, Recherches sur la contradiction, Vol.2. Paris : PUF Piaget J., 1975, L'équilibration des structures cognitives. Paris : PUF Popper K. R., 1979, Objective Knowledge. Oxford University Press
Sémadéni Z., 1984, Action proofs in primary mathematics teaching and in teacher training. For the learning of mathematics, 4 (1), pp.32‐34
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in EMP agree to the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Licenciada com a Licença 