Considerations about Ethnomathematics, the culturally relevant Pedagogy and social justice in Mathematical Education

Authors

  • Milton Rosa Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
  • Daniel Clark Orey UFOP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2023v25i2p145-165

Keywords:

Culturally relevant pedagogy, Ethnomathematics, Mathematics education, Pedagogical action, Social justice

Abstract

One of the challenges internationally faced by education systems is related to the growing number of students from linguistically and culturally diverse origins, a fact that calls the attention of teachers and researchers. Because these fields are connected to traditional education systems, there is a growing urgency to solve such inability to effectively reach all students. With respect to the social justice context, it is necessary assessing the embodiment of mathematics’ cultural perspective in the classroom, as well as creating the very basis for the ethnomathematics approaches and for pedagogy in mathematics discipline matrices, since it aims at developing this knowledge production. This approach focuses on promoting social justice and on the quality of students’ educational experience. Thus, this sociocultural diversity has growing in educational research, since it is an area that seeks to connect the daily experiences of students with the teaching and learning process aimed at making education systems humanized. In the context of social justice, it is necessary to examine how mathematics is found in all cultures and, at the same time, to base it on ethnomathematical and culturally relevant pedagogies that can assume, in mathematical curricula, the various linguistic and cultural forms of knowledge. Thus, the main objective of this approach is the integral promotion of student daily experiences in the school mathematics curriculum.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Milton Rosa, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto

Doutorado em Educação

Daniel Clark Orey, UFOP

Doutorado em Educação

References

Airasian, P. W., & Guillickson, A. (1997). Teacher self-evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 215-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Bandeira, F. A., & Lucena, I. C. R. (2004). Etnomatemática e práticas sociais. Coleção Introdução à Etnomatemática. Natal, RN, Brazil: UFRN.

Brasil (1996). Diretrizes e bases da educação nacional. Lei nº 9.394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Brasília, DF, Brazil: Casa Civil.

Chieus, G. J. (2004). Etnomatemática: Reflexões sobre a prática docente. In J. P. M. Ribeiro, M. C. S. Domite, & R. Ferreira (Eds.), Etnomatemática: Papel, valor e significado (pp. 185-202). São Paulo, SP, Brazil: ZOUK.

D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44-48.

D’Ambrosio, U. (1990). Etnomatemática. São Paulo, SP: Ática.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is ethnomathematics and how can it help children in schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(6), 308-310.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2007). Peace, social justice and ethnomathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiastic, Monograph 1, 25-34.

D’Ambrosio, U., & Rosa, M. (2008). A dialogue with Ubiratan D’Ambrosio: a Brazilian conversation about Ethnomathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 1(2), 88-110.

Gutiérrez, R. (2015). Nesting in Nepantla: the importance of maintaining tensions in our work. In Russell, N. M., Haynes, C. M., & Cobb, F. (Eds.). Interrogating whiteness and relinquishing power: white faculty’s commitment to racial consciousness in STEM classrooms. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Irvine, J. J., & Armento, B. J. (2001). Culturally responsive teaching: Lesson planning for elementary and middle grades. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Jiminez, R. T. (2004). More equitable literacy assessments for Latino students. Reading Teacher, 57, 576-578.

Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E., Harry, B., Zion, S., Tate, W., Durán, G. Z., & Riley, D. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(38), 1-40.

Klotz, M. B. (2006). Culturally competent schools: Guidelines for secondary school principals. Student Counseling. Principal Leadership, March, 11-14.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.

Lipka, J., & Adams, B. (2001). Improving rural and urban students’ mathematical understanding of perimeter and area. Fairbanks, AK: University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

Masingila, J. O., & King, K. J. (1997). Using ethnomathematics as a classroom tool: Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.

NCTM (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Orey, D. C. (2000). The ethnomathematics of the Sioux tipi and cone. In H. Selin (Ed.), Mathematics across culture: the History of non-Western mathematics (pp.239-252). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kulwer Academic Publishers.

Pinheiro, R. C. (2017). Contribuições do programa etnomatemática para o desenvolvimento da educação financeira de alunos Surdos que se comunicam em Libras. Dissertação de Mestrado. Departamento de Educação Matemática. Ouro Preto, MG: UFOP.

Romo, J. J., & Chavez, C. (2006). Border pedagogy: a study of preservice teacher transformation. Research Reports. The Educational Forum, 70(Winter), 142-153.

Rosa, M. (2010). A mixed-methods study to understand the perceptions of high school leaders about English Language Learners (ELL) students: the case of mathematics. Doctorate Dissertation. College of Education. Sacramento, CA: California State University, Sacramento.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2007). Cultural assertions and challenges towards pedagogical action of an ethnomathematics program. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 10-16.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2010). Culturally relevant pedagogy: an ethnomathematical approach. Revista Horizontes, 28(1), 19-31.

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2016). Innovative approaches in ethnomathematics. In Rosa, M.; D’Ambrosio, U.; Orey, D. C.; Shirley, L.; Alangui, W. V.; Palhares, P.; & Gavarrete, M. E. Current and future perspectives of ethnomathematics as a program (pp. 18-23). ICME13 Topical Surveys. London, England: SpringerOpen.

Rosa, M., &; Orey, D.C. (2017). Polysemic interactions of ethnomathematics: an overview. ETD, 19(3), 589-621.

Scheurich, J. J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high-achievement classrooms, schools, and districts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Torres-Velasquez, D., & Lobo, G. (2004). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching and English language learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 249-255.

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Baska, A. (2004). Working with gifted students with special needs: A curriculum and program.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-20

How to Cite

ROSA, M.; OREY, D. C. Considerations about Ethnomathematics, the culturally relevant Pedagogy and social justice in Mathematical Education. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 25, n. 2, p. 145 ~165, 2023. DOI: 10.23925/1983-3156.2023v25i2p145-165. Disponível em: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/emp/article/view/61379. Acesso em: 16 aug. 2024.

Issue

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE - CELEBRATION OF THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE JOURNAL EDUCAÇÃO MAT